Late Breaking News: Sept. 29 – Perjury? Dr. Ford Is Not A Licensed Psychologist/ W. Virginia Trump rally ~ September 29, 2018

Editor’s Note: Well, it appears the whole Kavanough/Blasey show is almost over. Perhaps this distraction was enough to keep the public’s attention from something far more critical. Many feel both Kavanough and Blasey are deep state operatives, which does make the whole show pointless…or does it?

President Trump has always had the ability to release the unredacted FISA memo, but choose to play a game perhaps to highlight and condemn the deep state even further in public eyes. Tonight at a West Virginia rally (see video below at 2:08:00), Trump was felt to be encouraging public action against liberals which could be an opening move to actively promoting a low level of public disturbance necessary for imposing martial law.

Is martial law a bad thing? Not necessarily, as martial law may be in order as events snowball ultimately leading to bank closures while central banks across the globe are closed allowing the Quantum Financial System to be engaged, as well as the long-awaited massive arrests take place. Timing is everything, so we shall see how Earth’s massive changes evolve.

It seems to me that while martial law is in effect, a reorganization of our government will occur. JFK, Jr. anyone? Of course governmental changes in the US will also occur globally evil power is not limited to the US. I also expect to see the Vatican exposed. Stay tuned!

What about the unusual activity being seen around the Sun? It appears as if the Galaxy IS showing up for the show soon to happen on Earth as mankind (finally) makes moves to throw off the yoke of financial slavery prompted by the deep state under the direction of evil.

As events ramp up  for a MAJOR change on our planet, the best thing you and I can do is remain calm, breath deeply. We have Galactic support and hopefully have prepared for, and respect, positive change. Please know regardless of your views, you are a divine BEing, you are loved, and…

InJoy!

________________________________________________________________________________

Testifying under oath before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Christine Blasey Ford identified herself as a “psychologist,” but records indicate this is a false statement. 

At the start of her sworn statement regarding the allegations of sexual assault against Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh, Dr. Ford may be guilty of perjury under California law.

While under oath, Ford opened her testimony be declaring:

“My name is Christine Blasey Ford, I am a professor of psychology at Palo Alto University and a research psychologist at the Stanford University School of Medicine.”

Dangerous.com reports: The issue lies with the word “psychologist,” and Ford potentially misrepresenting herself and her credentials, an infraction that is taken very seriously in the psychology field as well as under California law.

Under California law, as with almost every other state, in order for a person to identify publicly as a psychologist they must be licensed by the California Board of Psychology, a process that includes 3,000 hours of post-doctoral professional experience and passing two rigorous exams. To call oneself a psychologist without being licensed by a state board is the equivalent of a law school graduate calling herself a lawyer without ever taking the bar exam.

According to records, Ford is not licensed in the state of California. A recent search through the Department of Consumer Affairs License Bureau, which provides a state-run database of all licensed psychologists in California, produced no results for any variation of spelling on Ford’s name. If Ford at one time had a license but it is now inactive, she would legally still be allowed to call herself a “psychologist” but forbidden from practicing psychology on patients until it was renewed. However, the database would have shown any past licenses granted to Ford, even if they were inactive.

Ford also does not appear to have been licensed in any other states outside California. Since graduating with a PhD in educational psychology from the University of Southern California in 1996 it does not appear Ford has spent any significant amount of time outside the state. She married her husband in California in 2002, and completed a master’s degree in California in 2009. She reportedly completed an internship in Hawaii, but a search of Hawaii’s Board of Psychology licensing database also did not turn up any results for Ford.

What makes Ford’s claim even more suspicious is someone affiliated with Stanford University appears to have also been aware of the potentially damning use of the word “psychologist” and rushed to cover for Ford. DANGEROUS exclusively uncovered an archived version of Ford’s page on the school’s faculty directory. On September 10, 2015, the only archived date available, Ford’s faculty page was saved to the Wayback Machine and showed Ford listed as a “research psychologist” along with her email address and office phone number.

The most recent version of that page shows Ford listed only as an “Affiliate” in the department, with the words “research psychologist” removed along with Ford’s email address and phone number. This suggests the page was altered by someone very recently to scrub Ford’s contact information and title after she entered the national spotlight.

An archived version of Ford’s faculty listing, identifying her as a “research psychologist.”
An archived version of Ford’s faculty listing, identifying her as a “research psychologist.”
The most recent, edited version of Ford’s faculty listing.
The most recent, edited version of Ford’s faculty listing.

It is common for academics and researchers in psychology to not hold a license. California law does not prohibit anyone from engaging in research, teaching, or other activities associated with psychology if they are not licensed, so long as those individuals do not use the word “psychologist” when referring to themselves publicly.

Several searches on California’s licensing database revealed many of Ford’s colleagues in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Studies at Stanford are not licensed psychologists in California, including the department chairman Laura Roberts, who identifies herself only as a professor. Of the unlicensed members of the faculty — which includes researchers, clinicians, professors, and fellows — none refer to themselves as a “psychologist” or “psychiatrist,” unless they also had a license issued in California.

Aside from potentially misleading the committee, Ford also appears to have violated California law. California’s Business and Professional Code Sections 2900-2919 govern the state’s laws for practicing psychology. Section 2903 reads, “No person may engage in the practice of psychology, or represent himself or herself to be a psychologist, without a license granted under this chapter, except as otherwise provided in this chapter.” Section 2902(c) states: (c) “A person represents himself or herself to be a psychologist when the person holds himself or herself out to the public by any title or description of services incorporating the words ‘psychology,’ ‘psychological,’ ‘psychologist,’ ‘psychology consultation,’ ‘psychology consultant,’ ‘psychometry,’ ‘psychometrics’ or ‘psychometrist,’ ‘psychotherapy,’ ‘psychotherapist,’ ‘psychoanalysis,’ or ‘psychoanalyst,’ or when the person holds himself or herself out to be trained, experienced, or an expert in the field of psychology.”

This appears to include titles like “research psychologist.” There is one specific exemption to the law regarding the title “school psychologist,” which refers to school counselors who do not need to be licensed. School psychologists are legally forbidden from referring to themselves as simply “psychologists.”

Whereas the term “research psychologist” may be common in academic parlance, and permissible within accredited institutions, the issue seems to be publicly presenting oneself under any title containing the word “psychologist” if a person is not licensed. Ford is a professor and a researcher, but not a psychologist. Section 2910 of the law states, “This chapter shall not be construed to restrict the practice of psychology on the part of persons who are salaried employees of accredited or approved academic institutions, public schools, or governmental agencies, if those employees are complying with the following (1) Performing those psychological activities as part of the duties for which they were hired. (2) Performing those activities solely within the jurisdiction or confines of those organizations. (3) Do not hold themselves out to the public by any title or description of activities incorporating the words ‘psychology,’ ‘psychological,’ or ‘psychologist.’”

It is unknown why Ford, 51, a seasoned academic in the field of psychology would have made such an obvious mistake unless she was unaware of the law or trying to intentionally mislead the public and members of the committee about her credentials in the field of psychology. Her bizarre testimony often veered off into psychological jargon about brain chemistry, memory storage, and how trauma effects the brain, analysis one would expect from a clinical psychologist, rather than an academic involved in research. When asked by committee members of her most vivid memory from the attack that allegedly occurred nearly 40 years ago, Ford responded, “Indelible in the hippocampus is the laughter, the uproarious laughter between the two [men], and their having fun at my expense,” referring to the part of the brain mainly associated with memory. When discussing her trauma, Ford replied, “The etiology of anxiety and PTSD is multifactorial. [The incident] was certainly a critical risk factor. That would be a predictor of the [conditions] that I now have … I can’t rule out that I would have some biological predisposition to be an anxious-type person.”

Yet, Ford’s academic focus for years has been statistics, not memory or trauma. To look at her as some sort of expert in this area would be like asking a podiatrist about heart disease simply because he’s in the medical field. Still, the media ate it up. Hours after her testimony ended, various mainstream media outlets falsely identified Ford as a “psychologist” and praised her approach to science during the hearing, calling the statistician an “expert” on issues more closely related to clinical psychology.

The Washington Post ran a headline that simply read, “Christine Blasey Ford, psychologist,” The Atlantic’s headline read, “Christine Blasey Ford, A Psychologist, Testifies to Congress,” Slate‘s headline read, “Christine Blasey Ford’s testimony combined her own expert analysis of the situation,” The New Yorker‘s headline read “Christine Blasey Ford is Serving As Both A Witness And An Expert,” and the Wall Street Journal ran with “Ford’s Testimony Reminds Us That She’s A Psychologist.” As of Friday morning, Ford’s Wikipedia entry also identified her occupation as “Psychologist.” According to California law, all of these are false. Ford is not a psychologist.

The Senate judiciary committee is set to decide Friday on a date for Kavanaugh’s confirmation vote. If Ford committed perjury, she could face up to five years in federal prison.

________________________________________________________________________________

Advertisements

About cindyloucbp

Cynthia is the typical Pisces! Her left brain activities include scientific activities in the hospital laboratory as a manager. Her right-brain activites show as a painter, photographer and musician. She is known as the scientitst who sings!
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Late Breaking News: Sept. 29 – Perjury? Dr. Ford Is Not A Licensed Psychologist/ W. Virginia Trump rally ~ September 29, 2018

  1. Eliza Ayres says:

    Reblogged this on Blue Dragon Journal.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Captain's Blog

Travel News for the Collective Journey

HighHeartLife

Evolving Conscious Creators -- Denise Le Fay

Starship Earth: The Big Picture

What's happening on our planet---and why

RedefiningGod.com

A Resource for the Awakening Human

2012: What's the 'real' truth?

To find out, I hold a finger in the breeze.

Deus Nexus

Messages for an Entangled Universe

Judith Kusel

Soul Empowerment and Inspirational

THE MIND OF RD REVILO

Conscious Thought: Driven by Intelligent Awareness

Project i Am You

Activism, Awareness & Social Innovators

Brenda Ann Babinski

The Dawning of An Aging Aquarian

I Write The Music

Pushing At The Edges Of Creativity

Higher Density Blog

Love Is Always The Answer

GaiaPortal

Gaia Energy Messages

Kauilapele's Blog

Today's energies from Hawai'i...

Éireport Blog

Éireport Group Energy Reporting

Lucas 2012 Infos

Co-Creating The New Paradigm

The Portal

What in the World is on Cynthia's mind? Love, Spirituality, free energy, abundance

%d bloggers like this: