______________________________________________________________________________________________
News Release – 6/28/2023
Breaking News: Criminal Referral to JAG – SCOTUS Declares War on We the People
Community Support Foundation
PO Box 139
Logan, Utah 84323
Criminal Referral to US Military (JAG)
A Complaint for Misprision of Treason, Treason for Violations of Oath of Office, and Declaration of War against the United States was submitted to the US Military Judge Advocate General by Tom Fairbanks. Whistleblower Tom Fairbanks has been actively involved with Intelligence Support Activity (ISA), as a military asset, in undercover operations and exposing the Satanic Ritual Abuse (SRA) of children in Cache Valley in the State of Utah.
Following SCOTUS’ dismissal of Loy Brunson’s Petition for a Hearing on whether or not Congress broke their Oath of Office, by not investigating allegations of Voter Fraud in the 2020 Election, Fairbanks filed the criminal complaint with JAG through Military Channels.
Fairbanks’ Criminal Incident Report is drawn from the Brunson Filings personal suit against Justices Sotomayer, Kagan, and Brown) and SCOTUS’ decisions and the Criminal Complaint specifically addresses Brunson’s petition filed on March 21 2021, which was served to 385 members of Congress plus Joseph Biden, Kamala Harris and Mike Pence, alleging that they broke their Oath of Office by not investigating 50 allegations of voter fraud in the 2020 Election.
(NOTE: The two SCOTUS cases include Loy’s most recent case #22-1028, which he filed after Raland’s original case #22-380 was “DENIED” and appeals exhausted, plus Raland’s US District Court SLC, case # 1:23-cv-00042-JCB, a personal liability suit against Justices Sotomayer, Kagan, and Brown – all of which highlight that there is NO Constitutionally lawful position in claiming “immunity” — as is easily proven by the Oath of Office which requires defending “the Constitution against enemies foreign AND DOMESTIC”. The domestic enemy presupposes that traitors may exist even amongst judges and Congressmen.)
Fairbanks accurately pointed out that SCOTUS has repeatedly refused to rule on the singularly important question raised by the numerous petitions filed by the Bruson Brothers. The matter in question is not about the election outcome, but rather whether or not Congress took the time to investigate the allegations of voter fraud. No one has ever disputed the fact that Congress voted not to investigate the allegations of voter fraud.
Anyone having knowledge of the commission of treason, who conceals or does not, as soon as possible, disclose and make known the same is guilty of misprision. Bouvier’s 1856 Law Dictionary – accepted by four Acts of Congress – serving as commentary on Constitutional law, under the definition of “misprision” states a purpose of Fairbanks’ Criminal Complaint:
“It is the duty of every good citizen, knowing of a treason or felony having been committed; to inform a magistrate. Silently to observe the commission of a felony, without using any endeavors to apprehend the offender, is a misprision.” 1 Russ.on Cr. 43; Hawk. P. C. c. 59, s. 6; Id. Book 1, c. s. 1; 4 Bl. Com. 119.
Fairbanks also highlighted case law which states,
“Any judge (or elected official) who does not comply with his/her oath to the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the supreme law of the land. The judge (or elected official) is engaged in acts of treason.” Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S. Ct. 1401 (1958)
Fairbanks concludes by citing,
18 U.S. Code § 2381 – Treason: Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding office under the United States.
Remember, Not Everything is As it Appears and Where there is smoke, there is fire!
Tom Fairbanks
Intelligence Support Activity (ISA)
Community Support Foundation
(385) 467-3315
communitysupportfoundation@protonmail.com
Rose Rambles... 
I’ll keep this short. There’s no such passage in the case of Cooper v. Aaron, that Fairbanks supposedly “quotes” from. Indeed, the word “Treason” isn’t anywhere in the decision!
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/358/1/
I’d say that indicates precisely how much one should rely on Mr. Fairbank’s arguments: not at all!
LikeLike
I rather like “Fairbanks accurately pointed out that SCOTUS has repeatedly refused to rule on the singularly important question raised by the numerous petitions filed by the Bruson Brothers.” In this regard, SCOTUS refusal to judge accurately regarding a Congressional constitutional “requirement” is a treasonous activity? You would be a far better person to ask! Thanks for letting me know! 🌹😊💕
LikeLike
That the Supreme Court “refused” to hear either of the Brunson’s appeals was perfectly legal! They filed a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (which is how appeals are brought before the Court). The granting of such a Writ is completely discretionary with the Court, therefore there was nothing> illegal about their “refusal”.
(For the record, the Court gets thousands of such Petitions a year, and only grants less than 2% of them. So going in the Brunson’s had a greater than 98% chance of having the Petition denied.)
As for the “importance” of the “question” raised by those petitions, since both cases are complete malarkey, have no basis in Law, and in fact violate the Law regarding what can be sued on, and by who, it’s no wonder both cases got a “fail”. (As brother Raland’s second case, now sub judice before the U.S. District Court in Utah, will probably end up getting as well.)
Treason, as I’ve repeatedly had to remind those on my side of the Political Spectrum, is strictly defined by the Constitution. (Art. III, Section 3, Clause 1) Neither what Congress did, nor what the Courts (not just the Supreme Court) did fits that definition.
Which is where the importance of Fairbank’s bald-faced lie comes in! To repeat: the decision in Cooper v. Aaron does not even have the word “Treason” in it! Therefore his “quotation” (which is what you’re relying on when parroting that word) is completely bogus! I guess you think our country, its laws, and its legal system should be based on Lies!, I don’t. I doubt the JAG does either.
P.S. – That’s ignoring the fact that the JAG has no authority to do what Fairbanks (and apparently you) want. Essentially you’re calling for a Military Coup! In essence, you want “to render the military independent of and superior to the civil power”. That’s a quote from the Declaration of Independence, and it’s one of the reasons we rebelled against King George the Third! Maybe instead of listening to, and blindly accepting, the crap spewed by the Brunson’s and Fairbanks, you should spend July 4th reading the Declaration!
LikeLike
Well, Houston…we got a problem here. Joe Biden is a “faux President”, NOT having signed his Oath of office?
Then there is that election fraud thing… By the way, do you have any Zim? 😊💕🌹
LikeLike
Yeah, we’ve got a problem here all right: you’re a mindless Qnatic and Anti-Semite, who wouldn’t know Truth or Reality if it feel on you in the form of a ten ton weight! You’d just lie there wondering why you’re being crushed, and blaming it on the “Deep State”, or the “Khazar Mafia”.
You know, when people keep Evading and Avoiding the points I make (especially when I back them up with proof) the obvious conclusion is you have no good response to make! So thanks for confirming that Fairbank’s “referral” is simply more Frivolous Nonsense, like what the Brothers “B” are engaged in (along with your entire website)! 🤣
P.S. – Get back to me when you have an Honest and Rational response to make.
LikeLike