___________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
What in the World is on Cynthia's mind? Love, Spirituality, Free Energy, Abundance, Quantum Awareness
I talk about what others won't
Quantum, Expansion, Exporation, All That Is, The Art of BEing Hue-man, New Earth
"TRUTH IS STRANGER THAN FICTION"
We are going Quantum!
Helping others access and implement new creative skills.
News for the Collective Cosmic Journey
Evolutionary Ascension Process by Denise Le Fay
Jerry & Rosalie DeGregory
What's happening on our planet---and why
Soul Empowerment and Inspirational
Pushing At The Edges Of Creativity
Love Is Always The Answer
Gaia Energy Messages
Éireport Group Energy Reporting
Co-Creating The New Paradigm
All you need to know is this: today (June 26th) the Supreme Court DENIED Loy’s Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, just as (earlier this year) it DENIED that in brother Raland’s IDENTICAL (and equally Frivolous) case!
Click to access 062623zor_7m58.pdf
Of course, these grifter brothers can keep the scam going. This case now goes back to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, which will almost certainly rule against Loy, who will then try to appeal to the Supreme Court again, AND FAIL AGAIN.
Why am I so sure? Because, as I said, this case is IDENTICAL to brother Raland’s original case, which “died” in the Supreme Court earlier this year.
LikeLike
Thank you for this info, which is reposted on Roserambles.org! Having a salient legal operative commenting is valuable at this time…thank you! 😊🌹
May I ask your opinion of the views of Anna Von Reitz? http://annavonreitz.com/
LikeLike
Based on the link you provided, not much.
I’ll just mention she’s flagrantly violating the Separation of Church and State, a principle which IS “in the Constitution”, even if not expressed with those exact words. That’s true of many other principles (and other things) which ARE “in the Constitution”. For example: you can look until you go blind, but you’ll never find the following words or phrases in it:
Separation of Powers
Checks and Balances
Veto
Override
Freedom of Religion
Gun Rights
States’ Rights
Electoral College
The point being an argument based on the absence of SPECIFIC LANGUAGE in the Constitution (such as “separation of church and state isn’t in there”) is a PHONY argument, and pure Sophistry!
LikeLike
I understand this concept, such an argument could be seen as a case built on “smoke and mirrors”. It also explains why setting a “legal precedent” can be deemed critical. I enjoy your thoughts…thank you! 😊🌹
LikeLike