______________________________________________________________________________________________

Editor’s Note: Many thanks to Restored Republic for theformation below!
______________________________________________________________________________________________
- Former head of Roscosmos says NASA did not land on the Moon.
- Dmitry Rogozin ex-director general of Russia’s main space corporation explained, he asked his leadership team to look into whether NASA had actually landed a dozen astronauts on the Moon in the late 1960s and early 1970s. After all, Rogozin reasoned, “It was not clear to me how the United States, at that level of technological development of the ’60s of the last century, did what they still cannot do now?”
- This comes after NASA admitted they can’t go to the moon again because of Technology that was lost after the 1960s ( what kind of technology could have been lost, while one of todays Smart Phone is more advanced than all NASA computers combined together of the 1960s) .
- Dmitry Rogozin investigation team found not one piece of evidence that NASA landed on the moon. Russia had the technology to see where the moon landing was and knew the specific landing site , but in real time of the moon landing their was no photographs or documentation of the site and a half century later their is still no evidence or photographs of any trace landings of NASA on the moon.
- Dmitry claims a coverup with the Russian space agency and NASA took place and Russia did not want to EXPOSE NASA as fraud because they had good relations and Russia was scared to break international ties with NASA.
- With only one photo of the Earth taken by NASA in 30 years ( now there are a few photographs the past 25 years but still the photos are time lapsed photos and spliced together in sections , with the same excuse> because of clouds) since the moon landings , its reported the one photo in existence was stripped together in pieces due to clouds. _Today thousands of professional photographers and editors use Editing tools and can change the exposure of photos on computers and can clearly see the photos of the moon, the Earth from the 1960s as cut and PASTED .. Even photos from the 90s of Earth are clearly computer cut and pasted.
- In today’s fast moving world of the internet and leaks….. Hundreds of videos emerge of NASA Astronauts who are caught using green screen. Floating with hidden wire harness, dropping objects in a supposed zero gravity environment of space and so many other videos of Flies , mouses in NASA videos in space.
- Is it coincidence that Prescott Bush (Bush family) funded Hitler (this is in U.S. Archives and Google also has the data) and Operations Paperclip brought the NAZIS over to the U.S. And created NASA. And was it coincidence that Prescott Bush was inside YALE’S SKULL AND BONES secret society that help create the CIA and years later George h w Bush would be the director of the CIA and was also part of SKULL AND BONES ( that was once considered conspiracy but now proven a true secret society). Is it a coincidence that NASA was created with NAZI’S?
- How did Apollo 11 travel 500,000 (half a million miles) miles to the moon and back with one tank of fuel? and travel through 25,000 miles of the Radiation Belt and the radiation did not affect the electrical system?
- Why did NASA never go back to the moon? Then claim they lost the technology to travel back to the moon?
Dark Mission: The Secret History of NASA goes over it.
They found stuff on the moon, and thus, no more ‘public’ space missions, since.
LikeLike
Hmm…we shall see…😊🌹😳
LikeLike
I’m still waiting for ANYONE in a spaceship to say how they got past the Van Allen Belt.
LikeLike
they had the tech. I think Hoagland goes over all of it.
LikeLike
I kinda Agree with that…but doable! 😊🌹
LikeLike
https://www.enterprisemissions.com/datashead.htm
IF there was no moon missions, why make images loaded with machinery and other various technology, as well as glass domes and towers, miles in height? Would it not make more sense to have boring, bland, ‘safe’ images? There WERE moon missions…..they went up there for something, and they probably snatched that robot head, for starters. Imagine what could be discovered if they were able to access its computer brain.
LikeLike
Thanks…will do! 🌹😊
LikeLike
Thanks for sharing your thoughts… we shall see…fairly soon!😊💕🌹
LikeLike
Optics, make things at least appear “hey we did it.”
LikeLike
Yes, they make for good curb appeal! 😊🌹💕
LikeLike
@Rob
Then why not a plain, boring lunar surface? Why put stuff in it, that needed to be airbrushed out later? Why have sets of negatives be altered, with three original sets intact (1 of which the NASA guy KEPT for 30 years and then have to Hoagland?). And, according to Hoagland in darkmission, NASA itself STARTED the ‘the moon landing was fake!’ from the beginning.
Sorry, the ‘we never went at all!’ does not hold water.
LikeLike
Not the moon, the capsule. There is no way that little thing could get all the way to the moon with all the dangers. But let’s say it did.
LikeLike
All things are possible…! 😊🌹💕
LikeLike
We shall see…😊🌹💕
LikeLike
I also suggest reading this, unrelated, but worth reading. THIS is what got me into the meeting the aliens, waaaaay back as a kid in ’91.
http://hyperboreanvibrations.blogspot.com/2011/03/alien-artifacts-was-discovered.html
LikeLike
Thanks Neil, I’ll check this out! 😊🌹💕
LikeLike