B I G N E W S ! – by Editor Ken Cromar
…with UPDATE on Raland’s Utah case against Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Katenji Jackson Brown, for violating their Oath of Office.
I just got off the phone with Raland Brunson seeking updates on his brother Loy’s NATIONAL EMERGENCY filing under Rule 11 at the Supreme Court.
photo courtesy of Loy
Remember that LOY is from our very own Cedar Hills, and was neighbors with “Barbie & Ken” Cromar (Councilman from July 1994 to January 2000) living 7 houses apart. What is in the Cedar Hills water to inspire such Patriotic efforts to fight to save our Constitution.
Raland was excited to tell me that they had just learned a few minutes ago that the Supreme Court had DOCKETED their case (under Loy Arlan Brunson’s name) as LOY ARLAN BRUNSON vs. ALMA S. ADAMS et al. Supreme Court of the United States case #22-1028.
The 388 Defendants’ (385 members of Congress including Pelosi, and Joseph Biden, Kamala Harris and Mike Pence, 388 total) response is due by May 24 2023.
The actual SCOTUS Clerk Stamped filing will be posted here as soon as the Supreme Court makes it officially publicly available. In the meanwhile, here’s a sneak peek….
scans above courtesy of Loy
The Brunson Brothers Telegram at @BrunsonBrothersSCOTUS posted the following…
April 25, 2023
Watch for regular updates on this NEW Brunson Brother’s case under consideration by the Supreme Court for actual hearing.
NOTE: Raland Brunson’s case #22-380 made national news when as per the NEW draft of AFFIDAVIT OF GRIEVANCE for supporter to consider sending to SCOTUS in support. It reads in part:
On January 9, 2023 You denied The Petition for Writ of Certiorari, docket No. 22-380, and February 21st the Petition for Rehearing was “DENIED”, and the second such Petition for Rehearing received March 16 at 6:43 am, was “Declined” March 24th, and not docketed, which three instances demonstrates failure to reverse Your decision. On April 25, 2023 a second case by the Brunson Brothers filed as LOY ARLAN BRUNSON vs ALMA S. ADAMS et al. has been docketed at the Supreme Court under 22-1028, and herewith verifies this affidavit and gives You constructive notice of, but not limited to, the following:
a.) The said respondents named in the said Writ have taken an Oath to protect and defend the said Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic.
b.) A rigged election is an act of war against, but not limited to, the said Constitution. This Honorable Court has already ruled that one need not pick up arms in order to “levy war” in US v Burr (1807) 4 Cranch (8 US) 469, 2 L.Ed. 684.
[NOTE: An additional five points can be seen in the proposed AFFIDAVIT for public as We the People can consider signing and sending to SCOTUS at bottom.]
UPDATE on “The Raland SURPRISE”:
Raland J. Brunson vs. Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Brown
Speaking of Raland J. Brunson vs Adam S. Adams et al case #22-380, most are still unaware that in a stealth move on March 17, 2023 – St. Patrick’s Day — he filed a surpise! suit in SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, WEBER COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH – case #23091367 against THREE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES in Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Katenji Jackson Brown for denying his right to Hearing in the Supreme Court.
CHCRG provided two recent reports here….
Raland’s Federal Court Judge issued an order telling the three defendants to respond to Raland’s case
or be removed from office.
What did the three justices do? They lawyered up.
Yes, they complied with the Federal Court order and asked the judge, through a motion to not let Raland’s case move forward.
With their terminology they told the judge that they were too important for this case and that they should be immune from such lawsuits.
If the justices don’t like the Federal Court’s decision, they could then appeal it to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, and if they don’t like the decision from the Appellate Court, then they could appeal it to the US Supreme Court.
Said Raland “I gave them an settlement offer, that if they would grant me a hearing on my Brunson v Adams case, then I would drop my case against them, otherwise, this is headed toward the US Supreme Court”.
Presumably the three Justices would have to recuse themselves from deciding if the case will be heard by SCOTUS leaving that decision to the remaining SIX of the nine total justices.
Now THAT would be an interesting situation, right?
Here’s Raland’s Telegram posting about this yesterday…
Raland started a letter writing campaign for his SURPRISE case on the THREE JUSTICES on a brand new website called….
I, Ken Cromar, Editor of CHCRG here, was honored to be THE FIRST to sign my letter to Judge Jared C. Bennet of the District Court out of Salt Lake City.
In a short period of time 500 letters were submitted thru EnoughIsEnough.me online, followed by another 700 soon to be mailed.
Maybe you can be the ONE to add YOUR NAME next?
The PEN is Mightier than the Sword. JOIN the battle?
Raland Brunson & Ken Cromar have been invited to join Pastor Earnie Sanders in the second hour of his National broadcast of
What’s Right, What’s Left
in Second Hour at 9:00 pm Mountain Time Tonight!
Listen Live at: www.WRWL.org
Or find the podcast later at: https://omny.fm/shows/what-s-right-what-s-left1
AND / OR…. Consider this AFFIDAVIT FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCE (Word & PDF) to the nine Justices of the Supreme Court / Washington DC. It is only a suggested AFFIDAVIT. Please use the word doc to make it your own and personalize it any way that you want to sign your name to it and mail it to
Supreme Court of the United States
1 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20543
_ Affidavit – Declaration of Greiveances to be Redressed by SCOTUS – Fill in Blanks v3 – Loy Filing
* Affidavit – Declaration of Greiveances to be Redressed by SCOTUS – Fill in Blanks v3 – Loy Filing