_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Editor’s Note: (Thanks again to Restored Republic for this info below!) I consider this to be such as vastly important ruling by SCOTUS stopping any jurisdiction by any of the agencies conceived of by the government to “make our lives better”. Please read on below, and learn how our *** government is being dissolved before our eyes, allowing us to BE in…
Quantum Joy!
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
- The United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in W. Virginia v. EPA returns governing authority back to the American people by stopping dead cold any claim to rule-making by non-Congressional, specifically the EPA, and by extension any and all “alphabet agencies” including the IRS, CDC, FDA, ATF, FBI, AMA, ABA, UBA, UJC, CIA, DEA, DHS, DIA, DOD, DOE, FBI, INR, ISR, NRO, NGA, NSA, ONI, TFI and TSA, and the list of three-letter-agencies goes on, and on, and on.
- While uniform rules for the administration of all court levels, clean air, and efficient power generation, stopping grandmas from packing heat onto an airplane are worthwhile goals, greater security that comes from following the rule of law. Failure to abide by this Supreme Court decision may well be considered to be an act of Treason!
- “Courts are constituted by authority and they cannot go beyond that power delegated to them. If they act beyond that authority, and certainly in contravention of it, their judgments and orders are regarded as nullities; they are not voidable, but simply void, and this even prior to reversal.” (Williamson v. Berry, 8 HOW. 945, 540 12 L.Ed. 1170, 1189 (1850) emphasis added.)
- “A court cannot confer jurisdiction where none existed and cannot make a void proceeding valid. It is clear and well established law that a void order can be challenged in any court”, (Old Wayne Mut. L. Assoc. v. McDonough, 204 U. S. 8, 27 S. Ct. 236 (1907) emphasis added.)
- A court may not render a judgment which transcends the limits of its authority, and a judgment is void if it is beyond the powers granted to the court by the law of its organization, even where the court has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter. Thus, if a court is authorized by statute to entertain jurisdiction in a particular case only, and undertakes to exercise the jurisdiction conferred in a case to which the statute has no application, the judgment rendered is void. The lack of statutory authority to make particular order or a judgment is akin to lack of subject matter jurisdiction and is subject to collateral attack. (46 Am. Jur. 2d, Judgments § 25, pp. 388-89, emphasis added).
Rose Rambles... 