Submitted on August 15, 2022
IRS JOINS THE POLICE STATE
Compliments of the Lifschultz Organization founded in 1899
The plan is to use the IRS for police state control as well as the FBI with 87,000 gun toting forces.
This is like having both a Gestapo and SS. If this seems like an exaggeration, what was the FBI doing outside Roger Stone’s House or Rudy Giuliani’s apartment armed to the teeth. Were the three dangerous people including the former President of the US required of them to be heavily armed? Twenty years ago the US was nothing like this.
The FBI political raid on Trump’s house is par for the course. This was proven in regard to the hoax that Donald Trump was a Russian agent to prevent Trump from carrying out one of his campaign pledges which I recommended to him of detente with China and Moscow. We could replace the FBI with Homeland Security which is merely a duplication and save a lot of money. The FBI has proven itself to be a subversive organization and we have found little work on their part in stopping the flood of heroin into the US. Since the time of the founder, the homosexual J. Edgar Hoover, the FBI has been close to organized crime and looks the other way on the heroin operation.. This helps with our plan to cut the Federal budget by 75%.
The so-called coronavirus US death rate in 2020 was the same as 2019 as pointed out in this video by Dr. David E. Martin indicating that there was no pandemic in 2020. It was a marketing fraud by Pfizer, etc. Insurance death payments for insurance companies did not rise in 2020 the so-called pandemic year versus 2019. The US statistics conformed to this until they were rigged about September in 2020. The entire interview is worthwhile but the death rate part is at 18:30 minutes into the video for a couple of minutes for those who do not have time to listen to the whole interview. The death rates skyrocketed in 2021 from the coronavirus vaccinations. The insurance companies must state their own statistics accurately or be prosecuted for violating the US Security Laws for public companies unlike government officials.
Now, we really have a death rate problem in the US not from the imaginary coronavirus but from the vaccinations. Some insurance companies are showing a 40% increase in deaths and others 160%. Insurance premiums are rising 400%.
Dr. Martin says, “By their own estimate, they are looking for 700 million people dying globally, and that would put the U.S. participation in that of the injected population as 75 million to 100 million people. . . . There are a lot of reasons why they hope it will be between now and 2028 because of the illiquidity of the Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid programs. So, the fewer recipients of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, the better. Not surprisingly, the recommendation was people over the age of 65 were the first ones to get injected.”
Ask yourself if you have ever seen a healthy doctor. All vaccines are damaging but let’s just take the polio vaccine. Here was a disease caused by DDT which was eventually banned and coincidentally Salk introduced his vaccine as the case load was collapsing after DDT was abolished so he took credit for it. It is the vaccine that causes the remnant of polio now not a virus and never was a germ or virus. If we reorganize the medical profession that is 90% worthless, and concentrate on the emergency room which does provide a service, we can cure most of the population of disease by organic diets removing the cancer caused by inorganic methods of agriculture that cause cancer and teach in our schools that the chief cause of longevity and preserving beauty is following Saint Augustine’s holy concept of marriage as affirmed by Dr. J. H. Kellogg who invented the non-sugar corn flakes as well as taught in Russia by Joseph Stalin. This is discussed in the next link.
I also recommended stopping immigration which was attack on the wages of the lower classes and an American First policy to become industrially self-sufficient. Foreign companies can work in the US but they have to build the factories here such as Toyota and Mercedes and that includes all internal parts not just assembly lines. This gives us a surge capacity in the event of all out war that we had under the Henry Ford economy of World War Two that Ford helped design also for Stalin. Today the US cannot control the Russian and Chinese submarines in the oceans carrying hypersonic missiles which can disrupt the US just in time ocean supply line forcing the closure of the major US war industries right at the commencement of war. Under Stalin Russia was self-sufficient by 1937. The current leader of Russia Vladimir Putin is too corrupt and incompetent to understand this. He is merely an agent of Lord Jacob Rothschild and oversees Lord Jacob’s oligarch looting operation in Russia for two trillion dollars over thirty years just as we are in the US under his Lordship. As an aide to Yeltsin, I give Putin credit for the Yeltsin era.
The US budget can be cut 75% a number of ways.
We can cut the US Government employment in the US at least 75%. Let’s take the Federal Reserve with 23,000 employees which I could handle as Chairman of the Federal Reserve with 100 staff. If we simplify the income tax, we can cut the IRS by 90%. I am not going into each branch but enunciating general principles. These cuts are completely feasible and we would substantially raise the wages for those that are left so we get better people than what we have now in our dysfunctional government.
Let’s take immigration. Tens of billions of dollars are transferred by the illegal immigrants to their families by wire to support them in third world countries. End the right for them to make such transfers. Also, those who employ the illegals will be fined $100,000.00 for each illegal hired. That should end the problem at once and cause a mass exodus from the United States. It is more effective than a wall.
Now, it is elementary economics that currencies that float against each other cannot have trade deficits unless the float is dirty, and if they buy the dollar so Americans can buy the Mercedes Benz car cheaper than the US production costs at GM then the US car industry will die. Did anyone know that the euro is collapsing which will make their exports cheaper? The euro is $1.03 but in 1973 it was $1.87. This makes their goods very much cheaper. See chart in next link.
That is why under Obama the car industry was basically bankrupt though Ford was maintaining itself, and Obama rescued the US automobile industry which was very wise policy . If the Germans through the EU had not bought the dollar with the euro as they did for half a century under the Deutschmark, then the US could not have had a deficit. It would have floated downward based on supply and demand, and US consumers could not have bought the Mercedes as it would have been too expensive. I sent Trump as President the idea to buy foreign currencies until the US trade deficit was ended at once as they did ours when they destroyed since 1945 half our industry and he ran with it. The deep state shot it down.
Another way of cutting is to reduce number of the US military by 2/3 and tripling the salaries. This would eliminate low IQ types as Milley and Austin and we could hire high IQ types to handle modern high tech warfare. There can be no affirmative action against merit. Nor can homosexuals apply. Homosexuality should be criminalized again with severe penalties. We should create a Gulag for them to make them pay their way in prison like the old chain gangs. The massive cut in expenditures can come from cutting the number of bases 95% and withdrawing from NATO as Trump wanted to do.
Here we discuss the basis for Fortress American where the US has no obligations overseas other than to watch over necessary resources that we cannot obtain in the US. We have about 60% of what we need.
Americans are a very lucky people. They are bordered to the north and south by weak neighbors, and to the east and west by fish. Bismarck. In other words, we have a moat in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. George Washington was right that all foreign entanglements should be avoided.
“You are so happily placed in America that you need fear no wars,” said Bismarck, who ruled a country that bordered its rivals. “What always seemed so sad to me about your last great war was that you were fighting your own people. That is always so terrible in wars, so hard.” Bismarck
What Bismarck was saying was that the US does not have to wage war anywhere because unlike Germany it was not surrounded by countries that were powerful neighbors.
“The division of the United States into two federations of equal force was decided long before the Civil War by the high financial power of Europe. These Bankers were afraid that the United States, if they remained in one block & as one Nation, would attain economical & financial independence, which would upset their financial domination over the world (since 1776 for the US where concepts of republics, liberty, freedom were always just myths). The voices of the Rothschilds dominated. They foresaw the tremendous booty If they could substitute two feeble democracies, indebted to the Financiers. Therefore they started their emissaries in order to exploit the question of slavery & thus dig an abyss between the two parts of the Republic.” Otto von Bismarck, 1876.
It is important to note that the homosexual Abraham Lincoln had no interest in blacks and wanted them sent back to Africa. He emancipated them only so that it could undermine the southern farms where the young white men were in the Confederate Army and blacks were maintaining the farms. He issued the Emancipation Proclamation only to undermine the southern war effort. Had he lived they would have been sent back to Africa.
The Rothschilds connections to the US were originally conducted by August Belmont but later they switched to Peabody Morgan (Junius Morgan) in London and they controlled the US through this agent later called J. P. Morgan and Company.
The representatives from the Rothschild bank and the representatives of their subordinate banker J. P. Morgan had meetings with President Woodrow Wilson in 1915 to lend money to the British and French to pay for the munitions that these two countries were purchasing. These war sales from what were later called the merchants of death had a very stimulative effect on the US economy also cited as a justification of the loans. These large loans were approved as the sale of these munitions were considered very important to our exports but were opposed by Secretary of State William Jennings Bryan who said these loans violated our proclamation of neutrality and would drag us into the war but was overruled. Bryan resigned and he was right. The US sold Britain and France 7 billion dollars in goods for the war which is 700 billion dollars in today’s dollar. The overall cost of World War One was a hundred billion dollars or a ten trillion dollars in today’s money. The US spent 32 billion dollars on its participation in the war so we spend 32 billion dollars (3.2 trillion in todays dollar) to protect our seven billion dollars or 700 billion dollars in today’s dollars. That would not be good business and the business of America is business. Or so we might think. (Source for this paragraph is the “The Devil’s Theory of War” by Charles A. Beard, though this information is no theory. He was the most prominent historian in America at the time.)
The actual US declaration of war against Germany in World War One was a deal between the British Government and Baron Eduard de Rothschild trading Palestine for a US declaration of war against Germany and that was called the Balfour Declaration. General Ludendorff in his “Memoirs” called this an act of genius and he wished he had thought of it as Palestine at the time was under the control of his ally Turkey. Ludendorff wished he had done the deal as it cost him the war. The next link gives more details. The US experiment in republics, democracy, liberty, etc. was a fraud and it is and has been a dictatorship of the Rothschild financiers except during the brief period under President Andrew Jackson. Donald Trump symbolically had Andrew Jackson’s portrait in the Oval Office.
Now what gave Rothschild his power?
As for Emperor Nicholas II, while in France at a reception with the President of the republic, Baron Eduard Rothschild approached him and offered to redeem all Russia’s debts to France. In response, Russia would have to allow usury on its territory (in the Russian Empire, usury was a crime and was punished by law, our tsar refused, citing the fact that Russians are too gullible in these matters and will very quickly find themselves in financial bondage with usurers. Going outside, he told his closest assistant about this conversation with Rothschild and said: “I just signed my own death warrant.”
American poor are in hock to the bank credit cards for humongous sums at 25% interest. Where are the Democrats now to serve their constituency that they gave the shaft as the basket of deplorables to quote Hilary.
It was usury that gave the Rothschild family power. The purpose of trotting out Galileo over four centuries ago was not just some academic exercise. If the Bible could be disproven, then usury can be justified as licit despite Aristotle’s analysis that it was against nature. What Aristotle was saying is that if you have 244,000 tons of gold in the world lent out at 10% for one year, then the interest and principal is 24,400 ounces in interest or usury and 244,000 tons of gold or 268,400 tons in combination. The problem is that only the 244,000 tons of gold exists. That is what being against nature means. It also means that it cannot work which is the reason that all gold currencies based on usury eventually become fiat money. The fiat money eventually returns to its intrinsic value of zero as their gold base shrinks to next to nothing if not nothing.
J. W. von Goethe put it this way in his Faust Part Two:
i am fed up with this endless how and when,
if there is no money let us make it then.
This is transubstantiation alright! Only it is secular and not spiritual as in the Catholic doctrine which elevates its followers spiritually. It is the modern man who is so superstitious so as to become a real fool.
Now, if the Bible was disproven at least that angle is taken care of. So Galileo postulates that the earth moves around the sun. He can’t prove it and it was never proven. You have an appearance of relative motion which are equal but does not prove the motion of the earth or the motion of the sun.
Yet Galileo’s moving earth around the sun was promoted to free the world of the prohibition of usury and whoever opposed Galileo was considered an uneducated dolt. On this basis usury started to proliferate as the usurers as Shylock (Rothschild) took control of the world. In Shakespeare’s “Merchant of Venice” Shylock creates a loan to Signor Antonio that he forfeits his life if he does not repay the loan, and Shylock wants him to default as he seeks his death as he interferes with his business. He could not based on Christian principles in the Old Testament that loans cannot be repaid with interest or usury. Then, the new Shylocks invented monetary transubstantiation in that the paper money that did not have the gold behind it became a value in itself or as Marx wrote it became the jealous god of money. So now Shylock not only had the gold but a money or paper money that was as good as gold earning interest that did not exist in reality as gold. A new religion was formed which was the worship of imaginary fiat money as God to paraphrase Marx as it became the jealous God of money. Rothschild or Shylock now controlled the entire world.
Here is Galileo analyzed based on modern science in collaboration with the physicist John Archibald Wheeler and myself:
Today we have proof of geocentricity in that the earth has been proven to not travel around the sun as it does not move at all according the the interferometer experiments of Michaelson-Morely who could not measure the aether resistance of the motion of the earth around the sun. It was a long established belief in science that in order for the light to travel from the sun to the earth it had to be carried by the aether just as sound is carried by the air on the earth. If the earth moved around the sun it could be measured by the aether resistance that the interferometer was designed to measure. The interferometer measured zero resistance proving the earth did not move. Einstein then made the revolutionary pronouncement that there was no aether based on Michaelson-Morley which meant that the light traveled without a medium of transmission which was theoretically impossible.
This was latter refuted by Georges Sagnac by using the same interferometer to measure the rotation of the aether moving around the earth with the stars, sun, etc. which was called the Sagnac Effect. He measured that rotation by the aether around the earth in about 24 hours by its resistance thus proving the aether was there. This meant that Michaelson-Morely had absolutely proven the earth did not move around the sun as there was no aether resistance to the alleged motion of the earth around the sun. Galileo was proven wrong. This still leaves open the relativity question as to whether what Georges Sagnac had measured was the earth’s rotation or that of the aether itself moving around the earth with the sun, stars, etc. but it did decisively prove the earth did not move around the sun. I conducted my work on this subject in collaboration the physicist John Archibald Wheeler who totally agreed with these findings. John Wheeler and I then asked NASA to launch a satellite with the interferometer in it to validate these findings as they relate to the Sagnac experiment but they refused to spend the money. Here our desire was to prove that the earth did not rotate on its axis.
In the interest of being purely objective, I circulated the above paragraph to my Nobel Prize winning friends and here is the reply of Arno Penzias:
“M&M began the modern investigation of light, but had no way of detecting the quantum properties of space. This is very heavy stuff, that I don’t pretend to understand completely.” Arno Penzias.
Here is a write-up on Arno Penzias
Below is a write-up on John Archibald Wheeler
FACT CHECK: Did The FBI Use Unusual Force When It Arrested Roger Stone?
February 1, 20195:00 AM ET
Cindy Falco di Corrado joins with others to show their support for Roger Stone, a longtime adviser to President Trump. A number of Republicans have raised concerns about the way Stone was arrested at his home on Jan. 25.
Joe Raedle/Getty Images
In the predawn hours of Jan. 25, more than a dozen FBI agents raided Roger Stone’s home in South Florida and took into custody one of President Trump’s closest longtime confidants.
CNN showed the agents moving up the driveway with weapons and flashlights in footage that critics have said is shocking.
But was it unusual?
The short answer: No. Law enforcement agencies often conduct early-morning arrests or raids with large numbers of officers and tactical equipment.
The long answer: Republicans, including President Trump, say the FBI took unusual steps in the Stone arrest and they want answers.
“I thought it was very unusual,” said Trump, in an interview with The Daily Caller. The president added: “Many people know Roger, and Roger is not a person that they would have to worry about from that standpoint. And I thought it was sad to see it. Very sad.”
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, wrote to FBI Director Christopher Wray with a number of questions about the arrest, including whether it was similar in procedure to others with similar charges and why Stone wasn’t allowed to just surrender voluntarily.
“Although I am sure these tactics would be standard procedure for the arrest of a violent offender, I have questions regarding their necessity in this case,”
Republican House members Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, and Mark Meadows, R-N.C., also wrote to Wray, as well as to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, and forwarded their letter to the Justice Department’s inspector general.
Jordan and Meadows have spent much of the past two years criticizing aspects of the investigation being conducted by special counsel Robert Mueller, and they said the manner in which Stone’s arrest was carried was “unsettling.”
Stone himself has also been outspoken since the arrest, saying the FBI used “greater force” than was used in operations conducted on drug kingpin Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán and Osama bin Laden.
The FBI and Justice Department so far haven’t responded publicly to the questions raised by the president and GOP members of Congress.
CNN, meanwhile, did respond to questions about how it knew to position cameras outside Stone’s house on the morning he was arrested. The network didn’t get a tip, it says.
Its correspondents noticed that the grand jury that indicted Stone had met on an unusual day — Thursday, rather than Friday, as it normally does. That led the network to guess there could be an indictment unsealed shortly thereafter against someone involved in the Russia investigation, and one of the people it had been watching was Stone.
Michael German, a former FBI special agent and now a fellow with the Brennan Center for Justice, said Stone’s comparisons to the other raids were “ridiculous” and that armed arrests of this nature seem to have become standard over the past 20 years.
“It’s become much more commonplace to use either SWAT teams or tactically trained agents to do arrests across the board,” German said.
Authorities must take many factors into consideration before they take someone into custody, he said. “They have the responsibility to not only protect their agents, but the public at large and even the person they are arresting. Often the way to do that is with overwhelming force that would tend to dissuade any resistance.”
A number of other legal experts and former law enforcement officials also have responded over the past week, to say Stone’s arrest was not out of the ordinary — especially in a case in which prosecutors say they feared Stone might have tried to flee or destroy evidence.
“Was the FBI’s show of force too heavy-handed, as has been alleged? Absolutely not,” wrote James Gagliano, a former FBI agent, in a column for the Washington Examiner.
“In the FBI, we tend to defuse situations by removing the fight-or-flight inclination, via our overwhelming presence. To arrest one, we bring 10. For 10, we’ll bring 100,” he also explained.
Who Is Roger Stone?
Apart from the question about whether the procedures in Stone’s arrest were uncommon, German said the question it has raised is a sound one: Has law enforcement in the United States become overmilitarized?
“While it might be perfectly justifiable in this case based on what little we know, I would want to see Congress looking at this as a systemic issue,” German told NPR.
He also said Stone may have himself contributed to the way the FBI planned his arrest by his bombastic remarks, which have included posing with weapons and “training” at a firing range in case of a “civil war.”
“Part of the problem is, if you act crazy in public, you take the risk of people believing it,” German said. “If you’re saying things about resisting the government, then the government has to imagine that you might do that.”
THE LIFSCHULTZ ORGANIZATION