Editor’s Note: Are you sitting down? Exposure needs to happen, which prompts change, so… here we go.
I recommend getting angry (without violence), and then really understand why change IS happening right NOW (No Other Way)! Then rest in KNOWing something Beautiful is being prompted by the ugliness you see, leaving you to BE in…
In New York’s Washington Heights is a 4-story brick building called Incarnation Children’s Center (ICC). This former convent houses a revolving stable of children who’ve been removed from their own homes by the Agency for Child Services.
These children are black, Hispanic and poor. Many of their mothers had a history of drug abuse and have died. Once taken into ICC, the children become subjects of drug trials sponsored by NIAID (National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Disease, a division of the NIH), NICHD (the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development) in conjunction with some of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies – GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Genentech, Chiron/Biocine and others”
“the aids research establishment are responsible for this tragedy. The marketing of HIV, through press releases and statements, as a killer virus, has so distorted research and treatment that it may have caused thousands of people to suffer and die. “dr. Joseph Sonnabend, the Sunday times, 17 may 1992
the archive contains letters from scientists/activists to the lancet, nature and science whose editors’ point of view in the HIV/aids’ field is strictly settled, sealed, and situated as orthodox and monotheistic. The major science journals have invested in propagating the ‘hiv’ paradigm as the official game in this contested field of play.
Science journal editors represent the institutionalised site where they are situated as authorised agents of ‘aids discourse, thus sanctioning the ‘hiv’ paradigm as the authenticated game of play. Sociologist Pierre Bourdieu states, “each field calls forth and gives life to a specific form of interest, a specific illusio, as tacit recognition of the value of the stakes of the game and as practical mastery of its rules.
Furthermore, this specific interest implied by one’s participation in the game differentiates itself according to the position occupied in the game (dominant vs. Dominated or orthodox vs. Heretic) and with the trajectory that leads each participant to this position…
As a space of potential and active forces, the field is also a field of struggles aimed at preserving or transforming the configuration of these forces. ” the stakes are high in protecting and reproducing the profitable ‘hiv’polity because so many (Curran, Fauci, Francis, Essex, Gallo, ho, Montagnier, shaw, tedder, Weiss, etc) have had long-term vestedstakes in rigging and maintaining the ‘hiv’ poker game (at all costs).
These aids-players have placed their bets on the ‘hiv’ casinoeconomy where cheating always ensures lucrative pay-outs. As the dominant players, they gamble with the ‘hiv’ game “only insofar as their interest in following it outweighs their interest in overlooking it. ” (Bourdieu).
And since journals like nature, natural medicine, new scientist, science, scientific American, British medical journal, nejm, Jama, and the lancet have had high stakes in gambling the rigged ‘hiv’ game (in a deplorable way)for so long now they can hardly do a volte-face and confess to a gross-error of misjudgment; since such an admission would damage their scientific credibility.
So these science journals will have to hold out as long as possible in trying to salvage the’hiv’ fraud in order to save face and fortune. They have to keep (what Duesberg calls)moving the goal posts or change the rules of the game in order to extend the ‘hiv’ casino gambling licence.
Examples of this desperate’hiv’ subterfuge salvaging farce are to be found in fraudulent papers published in nature by: Michael Ascher et al. , (11 march,1993); Giuseppe Pantaleo/Anthony Fauci et al. , (25 march, 1993); Sarah darby et al. , (7 september, 1995); Feng Gao/Beatrice Hahn et al. , (4 February, 1999); and the articles by xipingwei/George shaw, et al. , and David ho/martin markowitz et al. , (12 January, 1995) – all of which should never have passed the peer-review process. Yet astonishingly these invalid papers are still being invoked by the ‘hiv’ faithful to maintain the fraud.”