There continues to be disinformation about the
GCR…what are you saying, Ron Giles? We get intel all the time about the
GCR and the RV and we are learning a lot. What do you mean about the
disinformation?
Let’s talk about the GCR, the Global Currency Reset.
If you want to understand the Global Currency Reset, you must understand the difference between gold-backed currency and asset-backed currency. Why, you ask, aren’t they the same thing? The answer is a Big Fat NO.
When
they say you must build your home on a solid foundation do you think of
sand or do you think of a concrete foundation that is not going to
erode and wash away. Have you not built a sand castle and then see the
tide come in and wash it away? If you had dug down and formed a
foundation and poured concrete you would see that it would withstand the
rising tide and not get washed away. Now if you wanted to build a large
high-rise building, you would dig down to bedrock and build your
foundation from there. Then you could rest assured that the foundation
is solid and you could build a large high-rise building that is secure.
It is the same way with currency.
Asset based currency, even if it is a large pile of gold, can be loaded up and sold right out from underneath the currency like the tide washing away the sand castle. Where is the solid stability of asset-backed currency when it can be mined and sold out from underneath the currency.
Even
if, let’s say, Zimbabwe, used all of its assets, which are huge, to
back its currency, would that secure their currency over time? They have
already tried and it failed.
A better course would have been to mine their gold and form it into billion bricks and put it away somewhere safe to back their currency. But they didn’t. They created Bearer Bonds backed by their assets to create value in their currency. These Bonds were useless the day they were issued. They had no reserves of
currency to pay the Bonds when a bearer presented the Bond for
redemption. The whole process was a scam on the people and the people
saw through it. So did the International market place which put
sanctions on Zimbabwe.
Their assets were effectively frozen because
there was a huge liability on the assets, placed there by the Reserve
Bank of Zimbabwe by using the Zim Bonds as currency. But going back in
time if they had taken the time to mine the gold and sell it on the gold market, they would have had the money to run the country. But
they tried the quick fix and bonded their currency using their assets
to secure the Bonds. Do you think that course of action, using assets to
back currency, created value in their currency? It was a disaster.
Couple
that disaster with a corrupt government and the people are the ones
that suffered. The people were tormented greatly and they have not yet
recovered with millions of Zimbabweans killed under the Mugabe
dictatorship. Their present President was number two in Mugabe’s
government and has a lot of blood on his hands.
The Zim Bonds, we hold act like a liability for the country. If
I took a ten trillion dollar note to Zimbabwe and presented it at the
RBZ for redemption as the bearer of the Bond, they would have to give me
a license to mine the gold or rare earth minerals, etc. in order to
sell the asset to get the note redeemed. Are they prepared for thousands
of people mining for gold indiscriminately all over the Zimbabwean
landscape trying to redeem their bearer bonds secured by the country of
Zimbabwe’s assets? Do assets work to back currencies? NO!!! ONLY GOLD DOES !
Get a grip on reality. There is no security in asset-backed currency. Nixon
took The USA off the Gold Standard with the whisk of a pen and all
security for our USD was gone. Even if we did have gold left to back our
currency it was not going to be used. The U.S. Government then used an
oil agreement with the Arabs to back the currency to create value. Any
nation that wanted to buy oil had to exchange their currency to USD so
they could buy the oil. The Petrodollar was born.
There
was a profit incentive to charge fees to exchange currencies back and
forth which was just another way to steal money out of the economy.
Asset-Backed? Bull-pucky!!!
There is no security in any currency backed by assets. Period!!! Mine your asset, put it in a secure vault and then use it to back your currency,
at least it could have the semblance of security for one’s currency.
However, that will never happen because of The Central Bank System; it
is a fraud. It creates money back by ‘thin air’; it’s call Fiat,
Another
Bull-pucky attempt is to establish value for a countries currency by
equating it to the Gold that a country owns. It is ludicrous for the
same reasons as above. So, if a country has huge oil reserves but they
don’t have gold, is their currency of less value than a country that has
a lot of gold. Have you tried to burn gold to run your car? Have you
tried to burn gold in your furnace to keep you warm? Whoever came up
with that cockamamie idea needs to go back to the 4th or 5th grade and
learn what constitutes value. If you’re going to try to pull one over on
us, at least make it reasonable or sensible. That one fails the test
miserably.
Now, there is a way to use Gold to back a currency.
Gold Backed Currency in the QFS means there is an electronic gold
certificate that refers back to a brick of gold bullion that has an
identifying serial number on it that sets it aside from the other bricks
that have their own serial number on them. The Gold bricks are set
aside in a safe impenetrable place. To establish un-erodible value, that
Gold Certificate then refers back to the Gold Bullion Brick.This means it is GOLD BACKED BY AN IDENTIFIED PIECE OF GOLD. The electronic certificate is transferred from one account to another whenever funds need to be transferred. When
one wants to transfer $100, it is 100 electronic gold certificates that
are transferred electronically while the gold backing the $100 is still
in the vault. THIS IS GOLD BACKED CURRENCY THAT CREATES VALUE IN THE CURRENCY AND THERE IS NO OTHER WAY.
The word “Asset-Backed” should never be used in the same sentence as Gold Backed. It
doesn’t belong there. It is inaccurate and when it is done it is done
by one who is ignorant of true Gold Backed currencies that are used in
the Quantum Financial System.
When the QFS is turned on and the old Central Bank, the
convoluted financial system is unplugged, the QFS will be the only
electronic system we will have. The Central Banking system will be gone,
dumped in the trash to never be functional again.
When you see an Intel report that does not include information consistent with the QFS and the Gold Backed currency, know that it refers to the old Fiat Cabal System that has absolutely nothing to do with the QFS…AND that this Intel is the Disinformation being bandied about by unknowing ignorant persons or by unscrupulous trolls.
Become a Purest in your QFS knowledge because all exchanges and all redemption funds will be put in the QFS that will only deal with Gold Back currencies. In the GCR all currencies in the world will be reset with Gold Backed currencies for each country and will be on par value with each other; and that my friends, is the Global Currency Reset. The IMF, the World Bank and the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) along with all Central Banks, are elements of the old Cabal fiat system and have absolutely nothing to do with the GCR or the RV that sets humankind free.
The IMF will not be part of the Iraqi revaluation. If it was, the revaluation would never happen. They
are Cabal. They may be repurposed in the future, but that’s another
story. If the Intel doesn’t support this understanding then dismiss it,
and dismiss any prognostications as well.
It is just disinformation. It could be Military Deception meant for the Cabal Operatives and is not meant for us.
We will wake up one day and the RV information will be given without any prior notice or set up. It will be a very pleasant & welcomed surprise. Then you can believe in it and set up your appointments and get Redeemed in person.
I pray all good people will stay the course and not allow themselves to be bamboozled by any disinfo; let the plan play out! We are loved and protected in the arms of The Father. Let’s stay together where we are all safe.
Ron Giles
Share this: Send the word out using these buttons!
Editor’s Note: Thanks to Prepare for Change for this one! What is all the fuss about returning to “gold standard”…what does that mean anyway? Currently, the US dollar is based on, well…nothing but the good graces of the Federal Reserve (which is not owned by the US gov’t!).
The Federal Reserve Bank is actually a privately owned bank that is linked to the US Gov’t acting as the Central Reserve for “official” monies used in the US. Who really owns this bank? Id you dig deep enough, the Federal Reserve is owned by a group of uber-wealthy bankers who are of Jewish descent,
These owners are directly tied to the Rothschild dynasty who indicate how the Federal Reserve should operate to the benefit of, well…the Rothschild’s and their game-plan for global dominion. Now you know why wars actually make money for the Rothschilds who actually back both sides of a conflict just to make certain they collect profit regardless of who wins.
Getting back to the gold standard, this move would effectively remove control of the Federal Reserve from their control of US currency. Trade between any one in the US would rely on how much “real” money they have which would be tied directly to ho much actual gold the US has in it’s vaults. Plus, whatever you may have in gold (jewelry, bullion) would jump in value drastically!
If the US returns to a “gold Standard” the following would happen: (1) The Federal Reserve closes or is completely over-hauled; (2) Prices would lower drastically; (3) interest rates may still be around, but would no longer be the main focus of banking (Really? No car loan?)
This may be the reason Trump has argued about the benefits using a gold standard for US currency AND has spoken negatively about the Federal Reserve with the opinion it should be closed. Good times are just around the corner, my friends, so…keep an eye to the news, join in local debate regarding this issue, and be…
As President Donald Trump named his picks to
fill two influential seats on the Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors,
the price of gold surged. That may be because one of the them, Judy
Shelton, is a believer in the return to the gold standard, a money
policy abandoned by the U.S. in 1971.
Shelton is raising eyebrows
among mainstream economists for her views, which include slashing the
Fed’s benchmark rate to zero and pegging the value of the dollar to gold
prices. She’s not the first Trump pick for the Fed to advocate a return
to the gold standard, with his two previous failed Fed choices —
Stephen Moore and Herman Cain — also advocating for a revival of the
policy.
In picking Shelton, Mr. Trump is aiming to place a
supporter on the Federal Reserve, which he’s argued is slowing economic
growth and depressing the stock market by keeping interest rates too
high. The Fed currently is maintaining its benchmark rate in a range of
2.25% to 2.5%, but Shelton has said she wants to lower rates “as fast, as efficiently, as expeditiously as possible.”
I
am pleased to announce that it is my intention to nominate Judy
Shelton, Ph. D., U.S. Executive Dir, European Bank of Reconstruction
& Development to be on the board of the Federal Reserve….
To
be sure, Mr. Trump’s second pick, economist Christopher Waller, holds
more mainstream economic views. The research director at the Federal
Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Waller has expressed support for
the independence of the Federal Reserve and allowing inflation to run a
bit higher, in order to help the economy recover from slowdowns.
Like
Mr. Trump, Shelton has a history of attacking the Fed’s policies and
supporting the gold standard, a monetary policy rejected by most
mainstream economists as antiquated.
The planned nominations were announced by Mr. Trump in a tweet late Tuesday. Each must be confirmed by the Senate.
What exactly is the gold standard?
It’s
a policy that links the value of a country’s currency to gold. The U.S.
adopted it in 1879, and it allowed consumers, banks and businesses to
exchange a dollar for actual gold. That may sound like a solid deal,
given that actual gold would back up your bucks. But there’s a downside:
A country can only issue as much money as it has backed by gold.
The
upshot is that countries on the gold standard have less flexibility to
respond to financial crises or economic downturns. Currently, the U.S.
dollar isn’t tied to any specific asset.
When did the U.S. abandon the gold standard?
The
long goodbye to the gold standard began with the Great Depression, when
panicked consumers sought to trade dollars for gold. To keep the
country’s gold reserves from becoming depleted, the U.S. had to offer
high interest rates as an alternative, which, in turn, made it more
expensive to lend money and hampered the country’s ability to rebound
from the Depression.
In response, President Franklin Roosevelt suspended the gold standard in
1933, a move which is widely credited with helping the country climb
out of the Depression. That’s because the decision allowed the
government to lower interest rates and pump money into the economy.
But
the U.S. still allowed foreign governments to trade dollars for gold,
until President Nixon abolished the policy in 1971 as a way to keep gold
reserves from depletion.
Why do Shelton and others want to return to the gold standard?
Shelton
argues it would mark a return to stability and hamper other governments
from currency manipulation. In a Wall Street Journal opinion piece,
she wrote “the
classical gold standard established an international benchmark for
currency values, consistent with free-trade principles.”
She added, “Today’s arrangements permit governments to manipulate their currencies to gain an export advantage.”
Others
argue that the gold standard would keep U.S. spending under control,
because the country would be limited in its ability to issue new money.
Why do mainstream economists believe it’s a fringe view?
The
U.S. economy has grown in complexity since 1971 and certainly since
1933, making the policy less feasible than in earlier eras. And a return
to the gold standard could in effect tie the Fed’s hands because the
central bank would be focused on gold prices, which are partially based
on how much of the commodity is being mined.
“A gold standard regime would be a disaster for any large advanced economy,” said University of Chicago economist Anil Kashyap. Supporting the gold standard “implies macroeconomic illiteracy.”
The
price of gold, by the way, is up more than 11% this year, passing
$1,400 an ounce this week. Bearish investors have been rushing to buy
gold the past few months amid concerns that global growth is slowing,
especially if U.S.-China trade tensions worsen. Gold jumped further
Wednesday as investors saw Mr. Trump’s Fed picks as yet another sign the
U.S. central bank won’t be raising interest rates anytime soon.
–With reporting by the Associated Press.
Share this: Send the word out using these buttons!
NEW YORK — For nearly two decades, one of the most overlooked and little known arrestsmade
in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks was that of the so-called
“High Fivers,” or the “Dancing Israelis.” However, new information
released by the FBI on May 7 has brought fresh scrutiny to the
possibility that the “Dancing Israelis,” at least two of whom were known
Mossad operatives, had prior knowledge of the attacks on the World
Trade Center.
Shortly after 8:46 a.m. on the day of the attacks,
just minutes after the first plane struck the World Trade Center, five
men — later revealed to be Israeli nationals — had positioned themselves
in the parking lot of the Doric Apartment Complex in Union City, New
Jersey, where they were seen taking pictures and filming the attacks
while also celebrating the destruction of the towers and “high fiving”
each other. At least one eyewitness interviewed
by the FBI had seen the Israelis’ van in the parking lot as early as
8:00 a.m. that day, more than 40 minutes prior to the attack. The story receivedcoverage in U.S. mainstream media at the time but has since been largely forgotten.
The men — Sivan Kurzberg, Paul Kurzberg, Oded Ellner, Yaron Shimuel and Omar Marmari — were subsequently apprehended by
law enforcement and claimed to be Israeli tourists on a “working
holiday” in the United States where they were employed by a moving
company, Urban Moving Systems. Upon his arrest, Sivan Kurzberg told the
arresting officer, “We are Israeli; we are not your problem. Your
problems are our problems, The Palestinians are the problem.”
For
years, the official story has been that these individuals, while they
had engaged in “immature” behavior by celebrating and being “visibly
happy” in their documenting of the attacks, had no prior knowledge of
the attack. However, newly released FBI copies of the photos taken
by the five Israelis strongly suggest that these individuals had prior
knowledge of the attacks on the World Trade Center. The copies of the
photos were obtained via a FOIA request made by a private citizen.
A high-quality photo, top, shows the area the dancing Israelis were staged. Credit | Panamza
According to a former high-ranking American intelligence official who spoke to the Jewish Daily Forward in
2002, the FBI concluded in its investigation that the five Israelis
arrested “were conducting a Mossad surveillance mission and that their
employer, Urban Moving Systems of Weehawken, NJ, served as a front.” At
least two of the men arrested were determined to
have direct links to the Mossad after their names appeared in a CIA-FBI
database of foreign intelligence operatives. According to one of their
lawyers, one of the men, Paul Kurzberg, had previously worked for the
Mossad in another country prior to arriving in the United States.
Another of those arrested, Oded Ellner, subsequently stated on
Israeli TV that the five Israelis had been in New York at the time “to
document the event,” meaning the attack on the World Trade Center.
The FOIA release of the photos is
notable because responses to prior FOIA requests to the Department of
Justice, which oversees the FBI, had previously claimed that all of the
photos taken by the Israeli nationals had been destroyed in January
2014. The photos themselves are heavily redacted, making it impossible
to see the Israelis’ facial expressions. However, previously declassified yet heavily redacted FBI reports state
that the Israelis are “visibly happy” in nearly every photo, even when
the burning towers are in the background. The photos released are also
not original copies and instead appear to be photocopies of photocopies
of the original pictures. In addition, of the original 76 pictures
developed by authorities from the camera in the Israelis’ possession,
only 14 were released.
However,
three of these photos — despite the heavy redaction and poor quality —
are damning. Since 2001, even though the photos were never released
until now, it had been known that one of the Israelis arrested — Sivan
Kurzberg — was seen in a photo “holding a lighted lighter in the
foreground, with the smoldering wreckage [of the twin towers] in the
background,” according to Steven Noah Gordon, then-lawyer for the five
Israelis, as cited in a New York Times reportfrom November 2001.
The
picture of Kurzberg with the lit lighter appears to be photo #5 in the
new FOIA release. Yet, the picture released includes a visible date of
September 10, 2001, the day before the attacks, as do two other photos —
images #7 and #8 in the collection — whereas all other photos with
dates show only the month and the year (9 ‘01). The FOIA release did not
provide any information as to the apparent discrepancy in dates.
While
this could be explained away as the camera in question being programmed
with a slightly inaccurate date, that doesn’t seem to be the case for
two reasons. First, only two out of the 14 pictures carry that date and,
second, previously declassified FBI reports report an eyewitness
adamantly stating that Sivan Kurzberg had
visited the Doric Apartments on September 10, 2001 at around 3 p.m.
with at least one other man, with whom he was conversing in a foreign
language, and had identified himself as a “construction worker” to a
tenant (page 61 of declassified FBI report).
Sivan Kurzberg
holds a lit lighter with the Manhattan skyline in the background. The
date September 10, 2001 visible in the bottom right corner | Photo #5
In
addition, the FBI report noted that a van from Urban Moving Systems,
the company that employed the five Israelis at the time of their arrest,
was present and was involved in moving a tenant out of the complex on
September 10 and that the movers all had foreign accents. Thus, images
5, 7 and 8 strongly appear to have been taken at the same complex a day
before the attacks. Kurzberg is seen in both images that display the
visible date of September 10, 2001.
This raises two possibilities.
First, that there are two images of Kurzberg with a lit lighter in
front of the towers, one taken before the attack and one taken at the
time of the attack, and that the FBI released only one of them. Second,
that Kurzberg took the picture with the lighter only the day before the
attack and his lawyer misrepresented the contents of the photo to the New York Times. Given
that the background of the photo — particularly the state of the towers
— is indiscernible in the recently released photo, it is difficult to
determine which is the case.
One of the Israelis points to what is presumably the World Trade Center, in Manhattan on September 11, 2001 | Photo #2
Yet, in
either scenario, Kurzberg had simulated the burning of the World Trade
Center the day before the attacks took place. That the FBI concluded
that Kurzberg was party to a Mossad surveillance operation at the time
of his arrest would then suggest that Israeli intelligence also had
foreknowledge of the attacks.
Notably, the relevant section of the
FBI report that asks “1. Did the Israeli nationals have foreknowledge
of the events at WTC and were they filming the events prior to and in
anticipation of the explosion?” is redacted in its entirety, suggesting
that the FBI did not determine the answer to that question to be an
emphatic “no.”
One of the 9/11 loose-ends coverups?
If
images 5 and 7 were indeed taken the day prior to the attack, the
question then becomes why the FBI officially concluded that the arrested
Israelis had no prior knowledge of the attacks? One report from ABC News dated June 2002 suggests that the Bush administration intervened in the investigation. That report states that
“Israeli and U.S. government officials worked out a deal — and after 71
days, the five Israelis were taken out of jail, put on a plane, and
deported back home [to Israel].” If the Bush administration had cut a
deal with Israel’s government to cover up the incident, it certainly would not have been the first time a U.S. presidential administration had done so on Israel’s behalf.
Further
evidence that higher-ups in the administration intervened is the fact
that then-Attorney General John Ashcroft personally signed off on
the detainees’ release. Upon his entering the private sector as a
lobbyist and consultant in 2005, the Israeli government became one of
Ashcroft’s first clients.
A
cover-up certainly seems to have happened to some extent, between the
destruction of records of the investigation and the fact that official
conclusions of the investigation do not add up. In the latter case, the
FBI — in a file dated September 24, 2001– officially stated that
they “determined that none of the Israelis were actively engaged in
clandestine intelligence activities in the United States.” However, that
conclusion was directly contradicted by U.S. officials a year later and by the fact that Israel’s own government subsequently acknowledgedthat the five Israelis had indeed been involved in “clandestine intelligence activities in the United States.”
In
addition, the new FOIA release of the photos suggests that another FBI
conclusion — that “none of the pictures developed from the film found
inside the 35-mm camera depicted the twin towers prior to the attack” —
was inaccurate. This may explain why the images released via the recent
FOIA request were heavily edited leaving details in the background
greatly obscured, making it impossible to determine whether the photos
were taken prior to or during the attacks based solely on the state of
the towers.
“Tourists” with cash-stuffed socks, box cutters, and explosives?
Beyond
the photos and observed activities of the so-called “Dancing Israelis,”
it is worth revisiting several other suspicious circumstances linked to
their arrest that clearly show that the men in question were hardly the
“tourists” they had claimed to be. One often cited example is the fact
that one of the men, Oded Ellner, had a “white sock-like sack filled
with $4,700 in cash,”
as well as maps of the city with certain places highlighted, and box
cutters. In addition, the van in which the Israelis were arrested was
“oddly” lacking “equipment typically used in a moving company’s daily
duties,” according to the FBI, and residue of explosives was found in
the van.
Of the explosive residue, the declassified FBI report states:
A
search of the van and individuals was conducted at the time of the
vehicle stop. The vehicle was also searched by a trained bomb-sniffing
dog which yielded a positive result for the presence of explosive
traces. Swabs of the vehicle’s interior were taken, and those samples
were sent to the FBI laboratory for further analysis. Final results are
still pending.”
In total, the FBI reported that four
items related to explosives were found in the ban and are labeled in the
report as “Fabric Sample (Explosive Residue),” “Control Swabs – SA [ – ]
Gloves,” “Control Swabs – (Bomb Suits),” and “Blanket Samples For
Explosive Residue.” In addition, a VHS tape and some still photographs
found in the van “were sent to Laboratory Examiner [ redacted ]
(Explosives Unit).”
In addition to the strange nature of some of
the Israelis’ possessions in the van and on their person, the company
that employed them — Urban Moving Systems — was of special interest to
the FBI, which concluded that the company was likely a “fraudulent
operation.” Upon a search of the company’s premises, the FBI noted that
“little evidence of a legitimate business operation was found.” The FBI
report also noted that there were an “unusually large number of
computers relative to the number of employees for such a fairly small
business” and that “further investigation identified several
pseudo-names or aliases associated with Urban Moving Systems and its
operations.”
The FBI presence at the Urban Moving Systems search
site drew the attention of the local media and was later reported on
both television and in the local press. A former Urban Moving Systems
employee later contacted the Newark Division with information indicating
that he had quit his employment with Urban Moving Systems as a result
of the high amount of anti-American sentiment present among Urban’s
employees. The former employee stated that an Israeli employee of Urban
had even once remarked, “Give us twenty years and we’ll take over your
media and destroy your country” (page 37 of the FBI report).
The FBI returned to search the premises of Urban Moving Systems a month later, but by that time found:
The
building and all of its contents had been abandoned by…the owner of
Urban Moving Systems. This [was] apparently being done to avoid criminal
prosecution after the 09/11/2001 arrest of five of his employees and
subsequent seizure of his office computer systems by members of the
FBI-NK on or around 09/13/2001.”
The company’s owner — Dominik Otto Suter, an Israeli citizen — had fled to Israel on September 14, 2001, two days after he had been questioned by the FBI. The FBI told ABC Newsthat
“Urban Moving may have been providing cover for an Israeli intelligence
operation.” Surprisingly, since at least 2016, Suter has been living in the San Francisco Bay Area, where he works for a contractor for major tech companies like Google and Microsoft. According to the public records database Intelius, in 2006 and 2007 Suter also worked for a telecommunications company — Granite Telecommunications — that works for the U.S. military and several other U.S. government agencies.
In
addition to Urban Moving Systems, another moving company, Classic
International Movers, became of interest in connection with the
investigation into the “Dancing Israelis,” which led to the arrest and
detention of four Israeli nationals who worked for this separate moving
company. The FBI’s Miami Division had alerted the Newark Division that
Classic International Movers was believed to have been used by one of
the 19 alleged 9/11 hijackers before the attack, and one of the “Dancing
Israelis” had the number for Classic International Movers written in a
notebook that was seized at the time of his arrest. The report further
states that one of the Israelis of Classic International Movers who was
arrested “was visibly disturbed by the Agents’ questioning regarding his
personal email account.”
A crowded dance floor
While
the case of the “Dancing Israelis” has long been treated as an outlier
in the aftermath of September 11, what is often overlooked is the fact
that hundreds of Israeli nationals were arrested in the aftermath of the
attacks.
According to a FOX News report from
December 2001, 60 Israelis were apprehended or detained after September
11, with most deported, and a total of 140 Israelis were arrested and
detained in all of 2001 by federal authorities. That report claimed that
the arrests, ostensibly including the “Dancing Israelis,” were in
relation to an investigation of “an organized [Israeli] intelligence
gathering operation designed to ‘penetrate government facilities.’”
The
report also added that most of those arrested, in addition to having
served in the IDF, had “intelligence expertise” and worked for Israeli
companies that specialized in wiretapping. Some of those detained were
also active members of the Israeli military; and several detainees,
including the “Dancing Israelis,” had failed polygraph tests when asked
if they had been surveilling the U.S. government.
Watch | FOX News December 2001 report on Mossad spying prior to 9/11
.
A key aspect of that report, compiled by journalist Carl Cameron, also
states that federal investigators widely suspected that Israeli
intelligence had prior knowledge of the September 11 attacks. In the
report, Cameron stated:
The Israelis may have gathered
intelligence about the attacks in advance and not shared it. A highly
placed investigator said there are ‘tie-ins’ but when asked for details
he flatly refused to describe them saying: ‘Evidence linking these
Israelis to 9-11 is classified. I cannot tell you about the evidence
that has been gathered. It is classified information.’”
One exchange between Cameron and host Brit Hume included in the report is particularly telling:
HUME:
“Carl, what about this question of advanced knowledge of what was going
to happen on 9/11? How clear are investigators that some Israeli agents
may have known something?”
CAMERON: “Well it’s very
explosive information obviously and there is a great deal of evidence
that they say they have collected. None of it necessarily conclusive.
It’s more when they put it all together a big question they say is, ‘How
could they have not known?’ — almost a direct quote, Brit.”
9/11 as a big — and acknowledged — Israeli win
If
the “Dancing Israelis”, and more broadly the Mossad and the Israeli
government, had foreknowledge of September 11, why would they remain
silent and not attempt to warn the American government or public of the
coming attacks? In the case of the “Dancing Israelis,” why would
Israelis celebrate such an attack?
One of the detained
“Dancing Israelis,” Omer Marmari, told police the following about why he
viewed the September 11 attacks in a positive light:
Israel
now has hope that the world will now understand us. Americans are naïve
and America is easy to get inside. There are not a lot of checks in
America. And now America will be tougher about who gets into their
country.”
While Marmari’s statement may suggest one
reason some of the “Dancing Israelis” were so “visibly happy” in their
photographs, there are also other statements made by top Israeli
politicians that suggest why the Israeli government and its intelligence
agency declined to act on apparent foreknowledge of the attack.
When
asked, on the day of the 9/11 attacks, how the attacks would affect
American-Israeli relations, Benjamin Netanyahu — the current Israeli
prime minister — told the New York Timesthat
“It’s very good,” before quickly adding “Well, not very good, but it
will generate immediate sympathy.” He then predicted, much as Marmari
had, that the attacks would “strengthen the bond between our two
peoples, because we’ve experienced terror over so many decades, but the
United States has now experienced a massive hemorrhaging of terror.”
Netanyahu, in a candid conversation recorded in 2001, also echoed Marmari’s claim that Americans are naïve. In that recording, Netanyahu said:
I
know what America is. America is something that can easily be moved.
Moved to the right direction. … They won’t get in our way. They won’t
get in our way… 80 percent of the Americans support us. It’s absurd.”
In addition, also on the day of the September 11 attacks, Netanyahu — who at the time was not in political office — held a press conference in which he claimed that he had predicted the attacks on the World Trade Center by “militant Islam” in his 1995 book, Fighting Terrorism: How Democracies Can Defeat Domestic and International Terrorism. In
that book, Netanyahu had posited that Iranian-linked “militants” would
set off a nuclear bomb in the basement of the World Trade Center.
During
his press conference on the day of the attacks, Netanyahu also asserted
that the 9/11 attacks would be a turning point for America and compared
them to the 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor. Netanyahu’s statement echoes
the infamous line from the “Rebuilding America’s Defenses”
document authored by the neoconservative think tank, the Project for a
New Ameican Century (PNAC). That line reads. “Further, the process of
transformation [towards a neo-Reaganite foreign policy and
hyper-militarism], even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to
be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event — like a
new Pearl Harbor.”
Then again, years later In 2008, the Israeli newspaper Maariv reported that Netanyahu had stated that the September 11 attacks had greatly benefited Israel. He was quoted as saying: “We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq.”
Indeed,
it goes without saying that the aftermath of 9/11 — which involved the
U.S. leading a destructive effort throughout the Middle East — has
indeed benefited Israel. Many of the U.S.’ post-9/11 “nation-building”
efforts have notably mirrored the policy paper “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm,” which was authored by American neoconservatives — PNAC members among them — for Netanyahu’s first term as prime minister.
That
document calls for the creation of a “New Middle East” by, among other
things, “weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria” and
“removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq — an important Israeli
strategic objective in its own right.” As is known now, both of those
main objectives have since come to pass, each withstrong Israeli involvement.
Feature
photo | Four of the Israeli nationals arrested for “puzzling behavior”
during the September 11 attacks are seen casually posing together in
front of the Manhattan skyline while the September 11 attacks were in
progress | Photo #1
Whitney Webb is a
MintPress News journalist based in Chile. She has contributed to several
independent media outlets including Global Research, EcoWatch, the Ron
Paul Institute and 21st Century Wire, among others. She has made several
radio and television appearances and is the 2019 winner of the Serena
Shim Award for Uncompromised Integrity in Journalism.
Share this: Send the word out using these buttons!
Never before in the history of our planet have we
been faced with such crisis and challenge: from climate change to the
invasion of SMART technology, from environmental degradation to the
growing war on consciousness. It’s enough to cause some people to shrink
back in their shells, but for many, the converse is true: challenge
inspires the emergence of soul, the catalyst to break apart the
constrictive mold. The time for playing it small in our shell has long
since shattered. Our times call on a new emergent breed of Spiritual
Warrior to step up and step out…
Extinction Rebellion
I was greatly heartened recently by Extinction Rebellion’s full-on but peaceful protests that
brought the City of London to a standstill for a week. Their approach
was to actively get arrested for peaceful but determined protest. I
spend a lot of my time travelling the world helping to raise
consciousness, and in so doing, I witness at first hand the escalation
of the ‘matrix‘
through SMART technology in all the towns, cities and airports in fact
pretty much everywhere. It is clearly drawing the masses in at an ever
escalating rate.
Something has to give, something has to break the
stranglehold of the dense energy. It’s going to take more people
embodying their unique soul vibration and daring to step out and be
them. Whatever the cost.
I say ‘what ever the cost’, but the point
being, that to truly embody ALL the qualities of your soul, not just
the surrender aspect, is going to take positive action of some kind. I
witness with many people around the world that the soul is being forged
in the crucible of great challenge. Can it be any other way?
Once there
lived a village of creatures along the bottom of a great crystal river.
The current of the river swept silently over them all — young and old,
rich and poor, good and evil — the current going its own way,
knowing only its own crystal self.
Each creature in its
own manner clung tightly to the twigs and rocks of the river bottom, for
clinging was their way of life, and resisting the current was what each
had learned from birth.
But one creature said at last,
“I am tired of clinging. Though I cannot see it with my eyes, I trust
that the current knows where it is going. I shall let go, and let it
take me where it will. Clinging, I shall die of boredom.”
The
other creatures laughed and said, “Fool! Let go, and that current you
worship will throw you tumbled and smashed against the rocks, and you
will die quicker than boredom!”
But the one heeded
them not, and taking a breath did let go, and at once was tumbled and
smashed by the current across the rocks.
Yet in time, as
the creature refused to cling again, the current lifted him free from
the bottom, and he was bruised and hurt no more.
And the
creatures downstream, to whom he was a stranger, cried, “See a miracle! A
creature like ourselves, yet he flies! See the messiah, come to save us
all!”
And the one carried in the current said, “I am no
more messiah than you. The river delights to lift us free, if only we
dare let go. Our true work is this voyage, this adventure.”
But
they cried the more, “Savior!” all the while clinging to the rocks, and
when they looked again he was gone, and they were left alone
making legends of a savior.
It’s time for those actively engaging in The Shift to
now take centre stream, to dive into the midst of your immaculate home
coming, and to express it out into the world. That doesn’t mean we have
to be egotistical or brash, but to be unreservedly, unapologetically who
we are. There are many who hold a vibrational frequency that when
expressed, begins to transform the surrounding environment – simply in
the process of being.
What is it that fires your soul?
Being Unapologetically YOU
However,
it is not just about firing the soul, it has to be forged in the
crucible of daily living too. That will certainly mean being authentic in
your relationships, being honest and true about how you really feel.
We’ll be in society, yes, and it’ll require us to honour the truth of
others, but that doesn’t mean compromising your own soul. You don’t have
to agree with another to honour them.
It
will mean being creative in some way, expressive, and facilitating the
emergence of light. A very positive transformation that’s also happening
in society right now is the increased acceptance of diversity – in
culture, race and gender. So let’s maximise that opening, fully embrace
our uniqueness and dare to step out and express it.
It is truly remarkable how the embodiment of authentic soul frequency can
have such a dramatic effect on our lives and life around us. But
certainly don’t be put off if many don’t yet get it. Look for the
positive feedback loops and let them animate your being – the smile on a
person’s face, the knowing twinkle in the eye, or else in synchronicity
through the call of a bird, the words in a song or the sign on a
billboard.
At Heart we are All Spiritual Warriors
The
times are challenging for sure. But the Spiritual Warrior is forged in
the crucible of great challenge. At heart we are all warriors in our own
unique way, and never before in human history, has there been such a
need, such a compulsion, for the aligned warrior spirit to arise.
So what is it that fires your passion?
How can you be more true to authentic expression?
What can you be creating in alignment with the divine as we shift to higher consciousness?
The Shift is calling for the Spiritual Warrior in us all!
About the author:
Openhand
is a unique approach to spiritual evolution: integrating enlightened
wisdom of spiritual masters through the ages, it is a way of tapping
into the Benevolent Guiding Consciousness of the Universe and aligning
with it in your life. It helps you unveil your True Self, remove karmic
blockages and unfold your Divine Destiny. It leads to authentic,
resilient and truly successful living.
Disclaimer:
We at Prepare for Change (PFC) bring you information that is not
offered by the mainstream news, and therefore may seem controversial.
The opinions, views, statements, and/or information we present are not
necessarily promoted, endorsed, espoused, or agreed to by Prepare for
Change, its leadership Council, members, those who work with PFC, or
those who read its content. However, they are hopefully provocative.
Please use discernment! Use logical
thinking, your own intuition and your own connection with Source, Spirit
and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not. By
sharing information and seeding dialogue, it is our goal to raise
consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement
of the matrix in this material realm.
Share this: Send the word out using these buttons!
Editor’s Note: Ok…I Am an experienced lab tech and Laboratory Director and am including this article on my blog so that you have some idea of how to protect yourself, or a loved one, if you are faced with the issue of infection with Candida Auris.
Although I work in Western Medicine, I prefer to use natural home remedies for my health care needs. I refuse to become a victim for “pill-pushers” and seek out alternative methods for maintaining my health.
So…might not be a bad idea to dilute a teaspoon of baking soda in water as a daily beverage (no more than this, please!). This will: alkalize your body (which is HUGE for reversing disease which LOVES acidity), might be good for settling the over-acidity of your stomach, and help you be more metabolically “in tune”.
Please read the article below, develop a taste/tolerance for diluted baking soda, and be…
A
hushed panic is playing out in hospitals around the world as a deadly
fungus is spreading killing a lot of people. Individual institutions,
national, state and local governments have been reluctant to publicize
outbreaks of this drug resistant infection, arguing there is no point in
scaring patients — or prospective ones, meaning they do not want to
scare patients away from going to hospitals. Officials are still
scrambling to keep a lid on it as the infection is spreading around the
globe, yet with the Measles, a dramatically less dangerous disease, they
are getting hysterical.
Thanks
to the over-prescription of antimicrobial drugs had also laid the
groundwork for this relatively new germ that preys on people with
weakened immune systems according to the New York Times. The infection – a fungus known as Candida Auris, kills almost half of all patients who contract it within 90 days,
according to the CDC – as it’s impervious to most major anti-fungal
medications. First described in 2009 after a 70-year-old Japanese woman
showed up at a Tokyo hospital with C. Auris in her ear canal, the aggressive yeast infection has spread across Asia and Europe – arriving in the US by 2016
Many
of these patients do not need to die but it seems like doctors,
hospitals and medical institutions would rather them perish than admit
that sodium bicarbonate is the best anti-fungal for this and other
fungal infections. Baking soda, also known as sodium bicarbonate, has significant anti-fungal effects. Laboratory studies show that baking sodais
effective against most fungal species. Bicarbonate inhibited the growth
of 80 percent of fungal isolates tested in one study. Many studies have
shown that sodium bicarbonate at high concentrations has an
antimicrobial effect over several microorganisms isolated from the oral
cavity, including Candida albicans.
Some
think that baking soda is the most potent anti-fungal substance there
is because of its ability to rapidly change the Candida colonies’ pH
from acid to alkaline, which effectively killsoff the yeast before it
has time to adapt to new environments. The problem with anti-fungal
drugs, is that fungi are extremely adaptive, and can accommodate
themselves to a new environment in three to four days. This renders
anti-fungal drugs largely ineffective. The fungi do not adapt to the
baking soda.
“It is a creature from the black lagoon,” said the
CDC’s Dr. Tom Chiller, who heads the fungal branch. “It bubbled up and
now it is everywhere.” In the last five years alone, it it has swept
through a hospital in Spain, hit a neonatal unit in Venezuela, spread
throughout India, Pakistan and South Africa, and forced a prestigious
British medical center to close its ICU for nearly two weeks.
Simply
put, fungi are evolving defenses to resist and survive modern
medications. “It’s an enormous problem,” said Imperial College of London
fungal epidemiology professor Matthew Fisher, who co-authored a recent scientific review on
the rise of resistant fungi. “We depend on being able to treat those
patients with anti-fungal medications,” that are no longer working for
this infection.
Science Daily said,
“Infectious diseases are the world’s number-one cause of death, with
pathogenic fungi being responsible for extremely dangerous infections.
Worldwide, more than €6 billion are spent each year on anti-fungal
medications, and the total costs of the medical treatment of infectious
diseases caused by pathogenic fungi are estimated in the order of
hundreds of billions of Euros.”
Fungus, Tuberculosis and Cancer
Dr. Luke Curtis is
reporting on research that deals with 27 lung “cancer” patients who
were later diagnosed with lung “fungus” instead of lung cancer. “Fungal
infection can present with clinical and radiological features that are
indistinguishable from thoracic malignancy, such as lung nodules or
masses.” Doctors who diagnose lung cancer are unaware of the fact that
cancer mimics fungal infections.Over one million people worldwide are misdiagnosed with tuberculosis when in reality they have an incurable disease with a similar outlook to many cancers, says a recent report published in 2011 in the Bulletin of the WHO.
The
disease called “chronic pulmonary aspergillosis” (CPA) is a fungal
infection not a bacterial infection. It looks very much like, or
identical to TB when doctors look at it on a chest X-ray. Fungal infections kill at least 1,350,000 patients
with, cancer, TB, asthma, or following AIDS; as well as causing untold
misery and blindness to tens of millions more worldwide. Yet, like a
Trojan horse its symptoms are mostly hidden, and occur as a consequence
of other health problems.
There
is no hiding the fact that baking soda, the same stuff that can save a
person’s life in the emergency room in a heartbeat, is a primary safe
and effective fungal treatment. In 2014 GAFFI–
‘The global action fund for fungal infections’ called on all policy
makers and health agencies to wake up to the plight of more than 300 million people worldwide who suffer and die every year from fungal disease. So why do doctors not prescribe sodium or potassium bicarbonate?
Disclaimer:
We at Prepare for Change (PFC) bring you information that is not
offered by the mainstream news, and therefore may seem controversial.
The opinions, views, statements, and/or information we present are not
necessarily promoted, endorsed, espoused, or agreed to by Prepare for
Change, its leadership Council, members, those who work with PFC, or
those who read its content. However, they are hopefully provocative.
Please use discernment! Use logical
thinking, your own intuition and your own connection with Source, Spirit
and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not. By
sharing information and seeding dialogue, it is our goal to raise
consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement
of the matrix in this material realm.
Post navigation
Share this: Send the word out using these buttons!