_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Editor’s Note: The information below, may, or may not be true. Nonetheless, this is posted for your own information. Please bear in mind that the author, Benjamin Fulford, is a Jew whose past reports have not been supportive of Trump. A recent study of Noahide Laws of Judaism do not appear to be caustic to any particular religious faith, yet require adherence to a worship of God.

Perhaps Trump, in order to gain familiarity and acceptance, perhaps has been involved with those of the dark in order to better learn the ways and means of the dark allowing a knowing of just how to “take out the dark”. On the other hand, Trump may fit the description of the “Anti-Christ” to a stunning degree! Please keep in mind, the Biblical vision of the “Anti-Christ” does stem from the Catholic-approved/derived version of the Bible.

Many choose to base their decision about Trump on the “fruit-of-the-tree” phenomenon. Have the actions of Trump, whatever they are, produced positive, or negative results? Once again, we are faced with a decision. Is Trump acting on behalf of himself…or the nation?

Your choice…

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

A few days ago, Donald Trump was given a ‘Torah Crown’ by the Israel Heritage Foundation. Their mission statement is “to await King David’s descendant, our Mashiach, to rule over the land and bring peace to all nations.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

United States Supreme Court

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. won his case against all pharmaceutical lobbyists.

Covid-19 vaccines are NOT vaccines. In its decision, the Supreme Court confirms that the harm caused by Covid mRNA gene therapies is IRREPARABLE.

Since the Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States, there are no further appeals and all avenues of appeal have been exhausted.

In a statement, Robert F. Kennedy emphasised that this success was only possible because of the international cooperation of a large number of lawyers and scientists. Naturally, this ruling sets a precedent internationally.

Especially in Switzerland, this ruling should cause a stir, because Switzerland has a special position with its federal constitution. On the one hand, the Nuremberg Code is in the constitution with Article 118b, and the misuse of genetic engineering in humans is prohibited in Switzerland, according to Article 119 of the Federal Constitution.

This is supplemented by Article 230bis of the Criminal Code, which means that the perpetrators RISK up to 10 years in prison.

However, this historic ruling should also give the rest of the world pause for thought, because the Nuremberg Code has international validity and is also contained in Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

In the case of criminal charges, the statement should refer to the Contergan scandal in order to give particular weight to the significance of this charge.

German lawyer Rainer Füllmich and over 100 other German lawyers are active in these cases.

NO media reports on this, neither in Switzerland nor in Europe.

Unfortunately, it is mathematical that, as this is a disruptive issue that can upset the financial and economic plans of the powerful LOBBIES of the PHARMACEUTICAL industry, the public will not be informed.

We are in the midst of a promotional campaign aimed at pushing people to vaccinate, and then again to vaccinate, in the run-up to next winter.

It is very likely that, if news of the historic ruling ever circulates, it will circulate late to allow the corrupt medical class, aligned to the positions of the pharmaceutical lobbies, to get as far ahead as possible with the vaccination campaign.

We therefore INVITE all honest people of good will to give the maximum dissemination to this historic JUDGMENT of the U.S. Supreme Court, for our own good, but especially for that of our children and grandchildren…. Let us not allow lobbyists to irreparably ruin our health and endanger our lives.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

Editor’s Note: Some may consider the video above to be extreme, some may consider this accurate. You get to choose?

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

The political landscape in the United States is heating up, with Texas at the epicenter of a fiery debate. The state’s governor, backed by other Republican leaders, is taking a hardline stance on border security. This move is more than just a policy decision; it’s a bold statement in the ongoing power tussle between state and federal authorities.

Texas isn’t playing by the usual rules. The state’s actions on the border, which include reinforcing barriers, are a direct challenge to the federal government’s authority. This isn’t just about border security; it’s a clear signal of defiance, a stand against what they perceive as federal overreach.

The situation is further complicated by the involvement of high-profile figures like former President Donald Trump. His support for Texas’ actions isn’t just a political endorsement; it’s a catalyst, fueling the fire in an already divided Republican Party. Trump’s influence is undeniable, and his backing of state-level initiatives like this is a game-changer, blurring the lines between state and national politics.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________