Federal Judge Kenneth Karas unsealed Jeffrey Epsteinβs suicide note in federal court this week. The document exposes the raw truth about the pedophile network that operated at the highest levels of American power for decades. Epstein wrote the note in July 2019 after his first attempt in the Metropolitan Correctional Center. It confirms the system protected him until the moment it no longer could.
The document contains these exact words: βThey investigated for month β found nothing!!!β It continues βSo 16 year old charges results!! It is a treat to be able to say goodbye.β Epstein wrote βTime to say goodbye. Watcha want me to do β burst out crying!!β and closed with βNO FUN β not worth it!!β Epstein put those words on yellow legal pad paper.
Discovery of the Document
His cellmate Nicholas Tartaglione found it tucked inside a graphic novel right after guards pulled Epstein off the floor with a cloth around his neck. Tartaglione turned it over to his lawyers. The document sat sealed for years while the Justice Department dumped millions of other Epstein files. This one stayed hidden until now.
This note destroys the official suicide story pushed by the bureaucracy. Epstein stated the investigators found nothing after months of digging. Then old charges from fifteen years earlier came back to life. That is the Deep State playbook. They weaponize the justice system against targets who know too much.
The Blackmail Operation
Epstein ran the biggest blackmail operation in modern history. He flew powerful men on his jet to his island. He recorded everything. Presidents, prime ministers, billionaires, and intelligence operatives all appear in the flight logs and visitor books. The note shows Epstein realized the machine turned on him once he became a liability.
Donald Trump saw through Epstein years ago. Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago after the predator hit on a young girl there. Trumpcooperated with investigators when they came calling in 2009. The same cannot be said for the Clintons or the globalist crowd that partied with Epstein right up to the end. Bill Clintonrode the Lolita Express dozens of times.
Ghislaine Maxwell still walks around with connections intact because the intelligence community never cut the cord. Epstein worked as an asset. His death and this note prove the protection racket failed only when the public pressure from Trump supporters became too loud.
Transparency and Accountability
The unsealing happens now for a reason. The America First movement forces transparency that the bureaucracy hates. Judge Karas cited public interest and accountability in his order. That language masks the real panic inside the agencies. They know more Epstein material sits in vaults.
Client lists, videos, and financial trails all lead back to the same swamp Trump spent four years draining. The note surfaces while Trumprebuilds the government. It serves as a warning shot to every holdover who thinks the old rules still apply.
Epstein did not act alone. He needed guards who looked the other way, cameras that malfunctioned, and prosecutors who slow-walked the case. The first incident in Julyshowed the jail system compromised. Guards falsified logs. Epstein sat on suicide watch then got removed.
The note he left proves he planned his exit on his terms because he understood the alternative. Real death came weeks later under identical broken protocols. The bureaucracy calls it suicide. Patriots call it elimination of a witness who could bury the elite.
The Fight for Sovereignty
This document connects directly to the fight for American sovereignty. Globalists used figures like Epstein to compromise leaders and push policies that hollowed out the middle class. Open borders, endless wars, and financial scams all tie back to the same network that shielded Epstein.
Trumpβs return threatens every piece of that structure. The note reminds every citizen how deep the rot goes. It shows why the FBI and DOJ must be cleaned out from top to bottom. No more sealed files. No more sweetheart deals for the connected. Full disclosure now.
Tartaglione sits in prison serving life for murders he denies. He kept the note because he knew it proved Epsteinβs state of mind. Lawyers authenticated the handwriting. The phrases match Epsteinβs known writing style from emails and other documents.
The public sees it today because the New York Times pushed for release, but the real pressure comes from years of demands by Trump allies who refuse to let the story die. This is accountability in action. The Deep State loses control of the narrative one document at a time.
Conclusion and Future Implications
Every American citizen pays the price when the elite operate above the law. Epsteinβsvictims still wait for real justice. The girls trafficked through his operation deserve the full client list. This note is another crack in the wall. It forces more releases.
It fuels the movement to dismantle the bureaucracy that covered for these monsters. Trump warned about this exact corruption. The note validates every word. The battle continues until every name surfaces and every protector faces consequences. The Americanpeople will settle for nothing less.
The unsealing marks another victory in the war to restore the republic. Epsteinβs words stand as permanent proof of the systemβs failure and the eliteβs fear. The machine tried to bury this. It failed. The truth now belongs to the people fighting for sovereignty.
Good morning, C&C, itβs Thursday! And itβs a C&C special edition about the Democrat Polycrisis (by popular vote, even though we donβt run any kind of democracy here). Enjoy.
ππΊπΈ C&C SPECIAL EDITION πΊπΈπ
π₯π₯π₯
If you listen closely to the wind blowing through Washington, D.C., you might hear a faint, high-pitched whining sound. That is not the sound of cicadas fluttering through the cherry blossoms. That is the sound of the Democrat Party realizing that the check has finally arrived, and their credit card was declined. Last month, the Washington Post broke a story that perfectly captures the Democrat Partyβs woebegone state:
Ruh-roh.
For the last few years, despite occasional bouts of truth bursting through the costumeβs seams, corporate media has generally assured everyone that the Democratic Party is in fine fettle. Sharp as a tack. It is, they say, like a double-decker bus packed with a coalition of highly educated coastal elites, powerful unions, a motivated gang of highly diverse grievance groups, plus legions of narcissistic white boomers who somehow still believe that NPR is the best way to learn whatβs going on in the world.
But underneath the hood, the engine was smoking, the transmission was held together by duct tape, and the bus driver was staring blankly at the dashboard trying to remember what to do when it makes that weird noise. The passengers argued about whether the bus should be renamed to something more trans-inclusive, whether to start with a land acknowledgment, and whether that weird noise was actually a microaggression.
Now, the bus has completely stalled out, parked on the side of the highway, and the passengers are sitting inside waiting for someone else to come fix it.
π₯ Corporate media is desperately trying to conceal what historians and political scientists call a βpolycrisis.β As defined by historian Adam Tooze (andthe World Economic Forum, which considered it an opportunity instead of a problem), a polycrisis happens βwhere disparate crises interact such that the overall impact far exceeds the sum of each part.β It describes where the political ground is destabilized from so many different directions at once that policymakers ultimately become paralyzed, usually while forming another gold-star committee to consider funding a new study on the destabilization.
Tooze explained, βIn the polycrisis, the shocks are disparate, but they interact so that the whole is even more overwhelming than the sum of the parts.β
Throughout history, apparently successful political parties have been sidelined or even destroyed in what appears to be an instant. The UK Labour Party spent nearly two decades in the political wilderness after 1979, for instance. The Republicans were nearly destroyed twice in the 20th Centuryβ one 20-year βwildernessβ stretch after the Great Depression, and another after Watergate (Time Magazine ran a cover story wondering whether the party could survive).
In both GOP cases, Republicans eventually recovered βonce by nominating a war hero (Eisenhower), and then by finding a unifying leader with fresh, genuine, ideological clarity (Reagan). The Democrats currently have neither option available.
And as weβll soon see, historyβs better example might be the Whig Party, which precipitously collapsed in 1850, leaving not a rack behind.
But amid all those examples, the modern Democratic polycrisis stands out as uniquely spectacular. Itβs experiencing the political equivalent of getting audited by the IRS on the same day your Pekinese chews through your internet cable and then your roof caves in right after you opened the insurance cancellation notice.
βThe Democratic Party has an aura of ineffectiveness,β NDSMC wrote. βThis is an existential threat.β The main problem, according to the author, is that the party is now only about opposing Trumpβ which manifestly is not working. So, the author argued, βwith that opposition, there needs to be an alternative message. Something that voters can get behind. An idea. A value. Not the lack of values. Not just anti-MAGA.β
Jim Messina, Barack Obamaβs 2012 campaign manager, agreed. βYou canβt win a presidential election on opposition alone,β he told Axios. Democrats (not MAGA) are fractured. βDemocrats are deeply dividedover what theyβd do if they returned to power,β Axios said. They intend to run against Trump in the 2026 midterms, but realize that wonβt work in 2028, when Trump is terming out.
Democrats must βbuild a message predicated on values rather than reactions,β the NDSMC author fretted, βlest they doom themselves to a future of perpetual minority status, forever living in the shadow of the MAGA right.β But what screamed from the pages was that the author had no suggestions for a message. Not one.
The reason he didnβt is the same reason the Democrats cannot fix this problem. Itβs a structural problem broken beyond repair.
Identity crises are the worst. A person or group questioning their very identity is a sinkhole of potential disaster. Itβs like the Democrat Party is bored with being a stay-at-home dad named Benjamin, and yearns to move to Las Vegas, change its name to Mercedes, get that special surgery, and become a stripper.
It would be bad enough if identity were the only crisis Democrats were facing. Letβs dissect the anatomy of this rapidly approaching fast-motion disaster.
π₯π₯π₯
A polycrisis isnβt just a regular old run of bad luck. It is a structural failure. In any normal political cycle, a party could lose an election, suffer a fundraising dip, or deal with pushback against an unpopular leader. Or even all three. Those problems are manageable. You just replace the leader, change the messaging, and pretend you never actually supported the things you supported yesterday.
But in a polycrisis, the mechanisms for fixing the problems also break. The disease and the cure become indistinguishable. Thatβs what Democrats face. They are currently trapped in a perfect storm of intersecting, overlapping, cannibalistic calamities, each feeding and feeding off the others.
Democrats core problem is that their party has become an βodd coalitionβ of wildly divergent interest groups united by only one thing: opposition to Donald Trump. The so-called βNo Kingsβ movement is the problemβs purest expression. No Kings is a hot mess of a tire fire, a janky collection of unrelated grievance groups, united only by deliberately vague policy positionsβ because articulating any specific proposal would immediately expose that half the coalition actively despises the other half.
When a political party has no articulable platform besides βwe are not the other guy,β a polycrisis is not just possible. It becomes mandatory.
Part II: The Crises Unfold – Coalition Defections and the Single-Issue Trap
Traditionally, the Democrat Party has billed itself as the champion of the working man and minorities. Today, it is increasingly the party of the wealthy, credentialed, and highly educated. This is a big image problem when your main message is βeat the rich.β Their hypocrisy is being noticedβ inside the tent.
The 2024 election exposed the fracture for all to see. Kamala Harris won 80% of the Black voteβ solid, but a massive 10-point drop from Joe Bidenβs 90% in 2020. President Trump secured 20% of the Black vote, the highest level of support from that demographic since George W. Bush in 2000. The shift was even more extreme among Hispanic voters, where Trump narrowed the gap to a mere 3 points, as compared to Bidenβs 25-point margin four years earlier.
The shift among young men is particularly stark. Men under 50 split evenly (49% to 48%) between Trump and Harris, erasing a 10-point Democrat advantage from 2020.
Instead of addressing these defecting votersβ concerns, factions within the Democrat party are doubling down on purity tests, which Iβve previously labeled as the βpurity spiral.β In Michigan, for instance, progressive Democrats punished the Harris campaign over the administrationβs handling of Gaza, proving that for some factions, βwallowing in the illusion of purityβ was more important than building a winning coalition.(Thatβs from last monthβs Detroit News.)
The Detroit News wrung its bony hands over the fruits of the stateβs recent Democrat primary nomination results, which produced far-left candidates whose views βraise serious questions about their electability.β
Recent polling by the Manhattan Instituteconfirmed the disconnect. The Democrat party is essentially three blocs: Moderates (47%), Progressive Liberals (37%), and a βWoke Fringeβ (11%). The median Democrat actually wants border security and safe streets, but the party is held hostage by the 11% who think math is racist, thereβs an infinite number of genders, and Karl Marx was on the right track but just didnβt try hard enough.
The Gerontocracy
While the Democrat base is fracturing, while fresh, bold ideas are needed to hold it together, the leadership is calcifying. The halls of Congress increasingly resemble a retirement home with excellent benefits combined with a surprising amount of insider trading that is best characterized as estate planning. As of early 2026, 24 members of Congress are 80 or older, over half are running for re-election, and the vast majority are Democrats. In the Senate, the median age of Democrats is 66, significantly older than their Republican counterparts.
When a reporter asked Representative Maxine βAuntieβ Waters, 88, why she continues to serve, she replied, βMy work is not finished, and I donβt know if it will everbe finished.β This creates a darkly comedic juxtaposition: a party ostensibly championing the future, yet visibly clinging to the past, with internal demands for βgenerational changeβ met with the political equivalent of βnot yet, dearie.β
Maxine Waters has now served in Congress longer than most of her constituents have been alive. At some point, βpublic servantβ becomes βgeological feature.β
An Increasingly Anxious Base
Perhaps the most under-appreciated aspect of the polycrisis is the perplexing psychological condition of the Democrat base. Studies consistently show that liberals report significantly lower levels of happiness and psychological well-being compared to conservatives. Maybe building an identity out of imminent global climate destruction and looming, ever-present fascism was a bad idea.
Progressivism is literally driving them insane.
According to the 2022 Cooperative Election Study, conservatives outnumber liberals 51% to 20% among those reporting βexcellentβ mental health, while liberals outnumber conservatives 45% to 19% among those reporting βpoorβ mental health. Read that againβ nearly half of liberals self-report having poor mental health. Shocker.
On a 100-point happiness scale, even childless conservatives scored a 63; while childless liberals scored a dismaying 48. So weird.
In their noble quest to bear the weight of the worldβs injustices, modern progressives have stumbled into a perpetual state of existential angst. While a conservative is happily eating a hot dog and thinking about tonightβs MMA matchup, the liberal is meticulously fact-checking the organic status of their kale, worrying about whether their lawnmowerβs carbon footprint is perpetuating the patriarchy, and wondering if they are using this weekβs proper pronouns.
A political base running on a steady diet of SSRIs and catastrophic thinking is highly susceptible to burnout. It becomes increasingly difficult to knock on doors for candidates when you are simultaneously convinced that the planet has only six months to live and your neighborβs F-250 is a hate crime.
The Laundromat is Closed
Running a modern political campaign requires astronomical amounts of money. For years, Democrats relied on two massive funding streams: small-dollar digital donations via ActBlue, and a sprawling network of government-funded NGOs. Both are now collapsing.
Last month, the Washington Post reportedthat the Democratic National Committee is facing a massive cash crunch as βtop donors have been slow to open their wallets.β The DNC had assured party officials that their resounding 15-point victory in the Virginia governorβs race would open the floodgates. βBut big checks did not flood back,β leaving DNC Chairman Ken Martin presiding over a financial and leadership crisis.
Meanwhile, Elon Muskβs Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has taken a sledgehammer to the NGO complex. DOGE first targeted USAID, leading to the elimination of over 5,000 programs. These programs were rife with fraud and political grift, with taxpayer money flowing through dizzying arrays of cut-out corporations to Democrat coffers. Musk bluntly explained, βThis is one of the biggest sources of fraud in the worldβ government-funded NGOs.β
The broader recent crackdowns on Medicare fraud, autism services, and daycare funding are systematically cutting off the federal spigot that has long nourished progressive advocacy groups and political operatives. The βblue laundromatβ is being condemned, and the DNC is suddenly discovering that running a political party requires actual money and real fundraising, which tends to be harder than making backroom deals with Somalian cartels.
Lawfare Blowback: The Raid on Senator Lucas
For years, Democrats cheered more enthusiastically than a high-school squad at tryouts while prosecutors launched unprecedented legal attacks against Donald J. Trump. Now, the bill for all that norm-destruction is coming due. Yesterday, for example, CNN reported, βFBI searches business, other locations associated with Democratic Virginia state senator.β
Letβs back up for a second. Last year, Democrats shook their fists after Pam Bondi fired most of the DOJβs Washington D.C.-based ethics βoversight group.β Democrats claimed it dismantled βethics,β but what it really did was unshackle local U.S. attorneys to pursue political investigations in their districts without the D.C. office shutting them down.
What is being called βa shocking escalationβ unfolded yesterday, when the FBI raided the Portsmouth office of Virginia State Senate President Pro Tempore L. Louise Lucas. Lucas, 82, another geriatric Democrat βservingβ for 34 years, was targeted in a βmajor corruption investigation.β Agents also raided a cannabis dispensary she co-owns. π
What makes this extraordinary βand to Democrats, sinisterβ is that Lucas was the lead architect of Virginiaβs Democrat-backed redistricting pushβ the map that Democrats were counting on to win up to four additional congressional seats. The person who drew the maps to save the House is now under federal investigation. (This also exemplifies Democratsβ gerontocracy problem: at 82, after 34 years in office, Lucas had apparently accumulated enough power, real estate, and cannabis dispensaries to attract the FBIβs attention. This is what a βlong and distinguished career in public serviceβ looks like in the modern Democrat Party.)
The weaponization of the justice system has turned out to be a double-edged sword, and currently, Democrats are holding that sword by the blade end.
As I reported yesterday, in Georgia, the DOJ has issued a sweeping grand jury subpoena demanding the personal information of 3,000 Fulton County election workers from 2020. Yesterday, a federal judge just shut down Fultonβs request to get its ballots back in a blockbuster 68-page order. NBC reported, βJudge says Justice Department can keep the 2020 election ballots the FBI seized from Fulton County.β
π₯ In November, several of Gavin Newsomβs political allies were indicted for corruption. Capitol Weekly, November 12th:
Also indicted were Greg Campbell, an influential Democrat βconsultantβ (fixer), Sean McCluskie, former Chief of Staff to Xavier Becerra, and McCluskieβs spouse. Alexis Podesta, a former secretary at the California Housing Agency who currently runs her own consulting firm was included in the indictment, but unnamed, as an unindicted co-conspirator. Her attorney said she was not charged and is cooperating with investigators.
Campbell and McCluskie pleaded guilty and are awaiting sentencing. Williamson, who refused to take a plea, has a criminal case and parallel ethics probe that remain pending. The available reporting strongly suggests this is bigger than just the named defendants, and is radiating outward through Newsomβworld and the broader Sacramento ecosystem.
The Collapse of Trad-Media
An entirely separate problem for Democrats is the collapse of the legacy media infrastructure that has for decades carried water for the progressive platform. Trust in mass media has hit a record low of 28 percent. Viewers are migrating to alternative media, mostly conservative or conservative-adjacent podcasts like The Joe Rogan Experience.
Corporate media is shifting rightwards. Within the last six months or so, conservative billionaires Larry and David Ellison acquired Warner Brothers (which owns CNN), independent commentator Bari Weiss was installed as editor-in-chief at CBS News, Jeff Bezosβ new head of the Washington Post fired 13 βclimate reporters,β and the list goes on. Furthermore, as you well know, X (formerly Twitter) under Muskβs ownership allows uncensored conservative content.
The Democratic Partyβs traditional megaphone is on the fritz. The batteries are running out. Which means they can no longer just scream βracist!β at their political problems and expect them to go away. They can no longer rely on corporate media to promote their narratives and psyops.
They are going to have to work harder to earn audience attentionβ but their problems are multiplied since they canβt enunciate clear policy positions anyway. They must feel like an aggressive drunk who dominated the barroom conversation through brute force until new management made him take it outside. Now nobody listens, and everybody feels better. And itβs much quieter inside.
Part III: The Whig Partyβs Warning from 1850
To understand where this polycrisis is heading, we can look back to the 1850s and the collapse of the American Whig Party. The parallels to todayβs Democratic Party are almost uncomfortably precise. Itβs kind of astonishing.
The Whigs were founded in the 1830s as a coalition united primarily by one thing: opposition to Andrew Jackson. Ironically, they sneeringly called him βwait for itβ βKing Andrew.β You canβt make this kind of thing up. In the first historical parallel with todayβs Democrats, the Whigs were a party defined entirely by what and who they were against.
Like modern Democrats, the Whigs were a coalition party. Because their fragile coalition included Northern industrialists and Southern planters, the Whigs needed to avoid naming specific policy platforms, which would expose their internal contradictions and anger one side or the other. In 1852, desperate to keep the coalition together, they nominated General Winfield Scott. Scott was 66 (ancient for the era), famously pompous, and nicknamed βOld Fuss and Feathers.β
Scott was also so physically enormous βweighing in at over 300 poundsβ that he could not mount a horse without a stepladder and significant, um, assistance. Today, that would be like being unable to fit into a normal-sized car without a giant shoehorn.
The parallel to Joe Biden βan aging, physically declining figure nominated purely because the coalition couldnβt agree on anyone elseβ is spectacular. Scottβs inability to get on a horse is the 19th-century equivalent of Bidenβs inability to walk a straight line across a stage without wandering off to shake hands with a potted plant or falling over a sandbag.
The Whigsβ fatal flaw was that they were a national party in an era when the central question of American politics βslaveryβ was inherently sectional. As long as slavery could be kept off the agenda, the Whigsβ coalition held. The moment it couldnβt, the party fractured and died. And a brand-new political party flowered into life (the Republicans).
Like the Whigs, todayβs Democrat Party faces a similar irreconcilable fracture line. Not just one. Several of them. Immigration, police funding, and trans βrightsβ are all solid examples. All of them are potentially slavery questions for the loose Democrat coalition. If the DNC takes a strong position on any of those issues, it will forever fracture the coalition. Thatβs why they canβt commit.
Take immigration, for example. The progressive wing views open borders and amnesty as a moral imperative rooted in anti-racism. But Democratsβ working-class wing βespecially unions, black, and hispanic voters, who are currently all defecting to the GOPβ views unrestricted immigration as direct economic competition that drives down wages and overwhelms local resources.
The immigration question cleaves the coalition along lines that cannot be papered over with vague language about βcomprehensive reform.β Every time the party tries to stake out a middle position, it simultaneously enrages multiple factions.
Progressives accuse leadership of fascism; the working class accuses leadership of abandonment.
The Whigs were destroyed not by a single catastrophic defeat, but by a slow accumulation of contradictions that ultimately made the coalition mathematically impossible to maintain. Then, snap. That is precisely the dynamic of a polycrisis, and it is precisely what the Democrats are facing now.
Part IV: Tipping Points and the Hegelian Synthesis
In complex systems theory, a polycrisis does not resolve itself gradually. It builds pressure until it reaches a tipping pointβ a threshold where a final small change βthe proverbial camelβs strawβ triggers an abrupt, potentially irreversible transformation or collapse.
For the Democratic Party, the 2026 midterms represent that tipping point. They face a brutal structural map, needing four seats to retake the Senate. Midcycle redistricting, wildly exacerbated by the Supreme Courtβs recent Louisiana v. Callaisdecision striking down minority-majority districts, has scrambled the House battlefield more thoroughly than eggs on a Waffle House grill.
But the most profound implication of where the polycrisis is going, and what it will make politically possible, can best be understood through the Hegelian dialectic: thesis, antithesis, synthesis.
But the most profound implication of where the polycrisis is going, and what it will make politically possible, can best be understood through the Hegelian dialectic: thesis, antithesis, synthesis.
The thesis is the current, chaotic, decentralized election system with late counting, mail-in ballots, harvesting, permissive voter rolls, and weak ID requirements. Democratsβ viability depends on that system, and they will fight to the political death to preserve it.
The Hegelian antithesis is the current crisisβ the ongoing federal investigations in Georgia, Arizona, and elsewhere, combined with aggressive crackdowns on non-citizen voting and the stalled SAVE America Act, which would mandate ID, citizenship, and strict voter purges.
If the DOJβs investigations produce credible convictions of election workers or political figures, it will shatter whatever remaining trust exists in the system. The synthesis is the solution that comes next, having been made politically possible by the thesis/antithesis dynamic. In this case, it will probably take the shape of a comprehensive federal elections bill. Maybe the SAVE Act. Maybe something bigger.
For decades, Republicans have called for uniform federal elections standardsβ mandatory voter ID, paper ballot backups, strict chain-of-custody rules, and aggressive enforcement against non-citizen voting. Democrats have blocked these measures, usually by claiming that requiring an ID to vote is racist, a post-millennial form of Jim Crowβ even though everyone needs an ID to buy Sudafed at CVS, cash a check, or go to a concert.
But if elections officials are convicted of election crimes, the political cost of obstructing reform will become prohibitive, and long-deadlocked change will suddenly become politically possible. The Democrats wouldnβt need to believe the convictions were legitimate. They would simply have to recognize that the perception of crisis was existential to their electoral viability. It would be like finally agreeing to wear a seatbelt because the airbag broke.
Supporting a federal elections bill becomes their only way to say, βWe fixed the problem,β as opposed to defending the obviously broken status quo. As Democrats scramble to plug the holes in the hull, they may soon find that the only way to save the ship is to agree to a new set of rules written by the people they spent the last decade trying to destroy.
If a strong elections bill is passed βwhether the SAVE Act or something elseβ Democrats may save themselves, but will enter their own 20-year wilderness period while they remake themselves into a party that can maintain a coherent message. Or it may be too late, and the longest-surviving political party in American history may be buried next to the Whigs.
Iβve only named some of the crises facing Democrats. There are more, like the 2030 Census, which most analysts predict will shift control of Congress and the electoral college back toward the GOP.
The Democratic polycrisis is not just a run of bad luck. It is the systemic collapse of a political coalition, a fundraising apparatus, an ideological project, and an institutional support network, all happening at the exact same time. The GOP could still lose its advantage by somehow snatching defeat from the jaws of victory, as it has a bad habit of doing, but the game is now theirs to lose.
The Democrats arenβt just losing the game; they are losing the whole stadium.
Have a terrific Thursday! Sprint back here tomorrow morning, for your regular-style roundup of essential news and caffeinated commentary.
For the second time in two weeks, a gunman, Michael Marx of Texas, had designs on assassinating the President and the Vice President of the United States of America, this time outside the structure that embodies American excellence: The White House. On Monday morning, gallant Secret Service agents noticed a suspicious character loitering near the front gate. He appeared jittery, pacing about like a fenced-in rooster, his shifty eyes scanning the South Lawn and Secret Service counter-snipers atop the roof. As he watched them, they watched him and saw the unmistakable imprint of a handgun beneath his shirt.
When agents approached the intruder, he drew his weapon and fled on foot, with agents in hot pursuit. They exchanged fire. No agents were hit, but the intruder was shot and wounded after one of his stray bullets struck a juvenile bystander, whose current condition is unknown.
Both President Trump and Vice President Vance were in the White House as the event unfolded.
An agency source told Real Raw News that liberal leftists and the global Deep State are so determined to eliminate President Trump that they have abandoned caution in favor of throwing everything at the wall to see what sticks. Our source said Marx, before expiring, murmured, βGet Trump,β and that agents found in his pocket a list of 18 names, the identities of whom he wouldnβt share. However, the presidential line of succession encompasses exactly that number, and White House Correspondentsβ Dinner shooter Cole Tomas Allen had intended to wipe out, from top to bottom, the president and all his men as they feasted on filet mignon and lobster tails.
According to our source, the Service has considered the possibility that radicalized leftists are experiencing a shared delusion, a shared psychosis far more deleterious than conventional Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS), and are willing to martyr themselves to stop Trump and MAGA from clinging to power after 2028. This emergent collective despises Trump for myriad perceived reasons: bad economy, the war, soaring gas prices, the Epstein files, immoralityβthe list of grievances is virtually endless.
βWeβre witnessing a new phenomenon,β our source said. βA swarm of radicals, brainwashed by Democrats, the mainstream media, and the rise of liberal podcasters. They think Trumpβs sold out the country and is wrecking it, and that he, or maybe his heirs, will keep wrecking it in 2029 and beyond. Personally, itβd be good if Trump runs and wins in 2028, but thatβs just my opinion. But these lunaticsβa lot of them want maximum carnage, clean out the entire Cabinet. A political cleansing. They donβt care about collateral damage, and Trumpβs always their number one target.β
Since Trump officially returned to office in January 2026, he added, the Secret Service has investigated over 13,500 βcredibleβ threats and foiled six attempts on the presidentβs life, excluding Butler, the Palm Beach golf course, and the correspondentsβ diner. Of the six, five had obtained weapons or constructed improvised explosives solely to whittle away at Americaβs leadership. Four of the six were well-educated and had held lucrative STEM jobs before succumbing to TDS. The Secret Service, our source said, has not disclosed these incidents because the details would certainly inspire copycats.
βThey all had manifestos,β our source said, βcontextualizing saving the nation means ridding it of current Republican leaders. Every single day, every week, weβre following up thousands of social media threats. Yeah, a lot are angry people just venting, but among those, there are those who have the means and will to kill. No president in American history has faced this much irrational hatred. Itβs sad. Weβre vigilant. Anyone wanting to harm President Trump, his family, or the administrationβtheyβll get dealt with appropriately. I doubt weβve seen the last of the TDS assassins.β
Note: I appologize for slowness is getting articles out over the last two weeks; Iβve been caregiving an injured family member. Situation should improve next week. Thank you for your patience.
Judy Note:Iβm sorry, but I just have not had time to complete an update tonight.
My personal opinion is that we will have messages over our phones beginning Sunday, possibly notification to set exchange appointments next Tuesday and the ten days of darkness after that⦠but that is just my guess.
My cosmic tides are shifting, encouraging you to turn your gaze from the world outside to the universe within.
This sacred pause, guided by Pluto’s quiet retrograde, is an invitation to gently examine the deep-seated patterns and soul-level beliefs that have authored your story until now.
This is not a time for pushing or striving; it is a time for listening to the truths that are ready to blossom from the inside out.
There is a profound strength that comes from meeting yourself with grace and understanding.
The inner awareness you cultivate in this moment holds the power to reshape your entire reality.
Rose Rambles... 