Peruvian contactee Ricardo González Corpancho shared one of the most profound revelations he says he received from the Apunians – humanoids from the Alpha Centauri system.
According to them, before incarnating on Earth, every soul signs a Life Agreement – a conscious cosmic contract.
In this agreement, we choose for ourselves:
• the main lessons we want to learn, • the key relationships and challenges we will experience, • the mission and purpose of this incarnation.
It is not a punishment. It is not random fate.
It is a voluntary agreement between our eternal soul and a greater cosmic plan.
The Apunians emphasized that when we remember – or simply begin living in harmony with this agreement – life becomes filled with powerful synchronicities, and the doors to higher contact begin to open naturally.
Ricardo often repeats in his books and lectures: “We are not victims of circumstances. We are co-creators who chose this adventure ourselves.”
It makes you wonder – what did your soul agree to experience and bring into this world during this lifetime?
Do you feel that some things in your life were “meant to be”?
Have you ever had the feeling that you signed this agreement before coming here?
The wholly captured and iatrogenic FDA has finally lost their war on the Nobel wining miracle drug Ivetmectin.
The murderous FDA, CDC, WHO, the Intelligence Industrial Complex and their One World Government handlers always knew that Ivermectin
would stop their Gain of Function (GOF) virus dead in its tracks, cure cancer, prevent the rollout of their slow kill bioweapon “vaccines,” and essentially put their Medical Industrial Complex out of business.
They attempted to interfere with doctors working to save lives with repurposed drugs, while bribing other doctors and healthcare bureaucrats to murder their patients with fraudulent PSYOP-19 hospital protocols. These protocols included the deliberate prevention of early treatments such that they could then administer their deadly Remdisivir and Midazolam en route to murder by intubation. Each of these hospital COVID kill would earn $56,000 via theft from taxes from the illegitimate Federal government. This is the naked definition of democide.
Ivermectin had to be stopped, but these deranged technocrats have once again failed in their Great Reset plans for us.
So let’s stick it to these “leaders” and “experts” and stock up on lifesaving products that they most desperately do not want anyone to have access to:
Ivermectin is perhaps the single best treatment not just for PSYOP-19, but for the spike protein damage that is induced by the slow kill bioweapon injections.
Since the rollout of the “pandemic,” ivermectin was savaged by the quisling MSM, the various illegitimate Federal government agencies and their CDC, WHO, UN, WEF, Rockefeller and Gates “nonprofit” foundations, et al. partners in crime.
The scientific community performed fraudulent “Trust the Science” studies, and their coconspirator “peer reviewed” journals hurriedly published them in a coordinated effort to discredit ivermectin.
These Crimes Against Humanity were perpetrated in order to push through the EUA “experimental” DEATHVAX™ that BigPharma manufactured in no time without any real trials on behalf of their DoD, Pentagon, CIA, NIH, and NIAID handlers.
But the real studies all irrefutably showed that ivermectin was, unlike the “vaccines,” actually exceptionally safe and exceedingly effective at treating PSYOP-19.
But the wholly captured and criminal FDA, the very same FDA that attempted to seal Pfizer’s corrupt research for 75 years, was shilling hard against the Nobel Prize winning “horse paste” medicine; to wit:
Free speech absolutist” fraudster Elon Musk is still blocking Tweets on Substack — click the image to link to the FDA’s deceitful Tweet.
Synergistic pairing of ivermectin and fenbendazole found HIGHLY EFFECTIVE at preventing and treating cancer
This Substack has recently written about the wonder drugs Ivermectin and Fenbendazole: As a combination therapy these two drugs offer a highly synergistic approach to curing a wide range of ailments from slow kill bioweapon injection damage to prion-based diseases to (turbo) cancers, etc.
During the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) “pandemic,” the powers that be made it a top priority to discourage and even prevent the general public from using ivermectin as a prophylactic, instead pushing masks and “vaccines.” Well now there is another use
for ivermectin that is sure to put it right back in Big Pharma’s crosshairs, and it involves the treatment of cancer.
One of the “side effects” of taking ivermectin for COVID, it turns out, is that it also helps prevent cancer cells and tumors from forming. This could be very helpful for those dealing with the sudden onset of “turbo cancer,” a phenomenon that appeared not long after the launch of Operation Warp Speed.
If “fully vaccinated” people who got jabbed for COVID had easy access to ivermectin, many of them could potentially find relief and healing from it. And even better is the fact that fenbendazole, another anti-parasite drug, also works to fight against cancer.
“What would happen if one did a combination therapy for both the prevention and treatment of cancer using BOTH ivermectin and fenbendazole?” asks “2nd Smartest Guy in the World” on his Substack. “The synergistic pairing would be far more effective than just using one of these miraculous drugs.”
Ivermectin and quercetin together fight prion diseases
When taken together, Ivermectin, snd Fembendazole deliver a one-two punch to cancer. When combined with other cancer nutrients such as vitamins C and D, the affects are even more pronounced.
Preclinical studies show that both ivermectin and fenbendazole exhibit cytotoxic effects against cancer cells. The two drugs also inhibit the growth and spread of cancerous tumors.
“The mechanisms underlying these effects appear to involve disruption of critical cellular processes, leading to cancer cell death,” wrote Sid Belzberg in a paper cited by one of 2nd Smartest Guy in the World’s readers.
Both ivermectin and fenbendazole are off-patent drugs, meaning their original intended use as licensed has expired and they have become generics. This allows for many different generic drug manufacturers, including a slew of them across India, to produce them cheaply and abundantly.
United States regulators make it hard to access them without a prescription – unless you purchase the versions available for pets – but they are out there. And when combined with other anti-cancer vitamins and minerals they show incredible promise in cancer prevention and mitigation.
You will be hard-pressed to find much helpful information about these two drugs in the mainstream, though. Because they are off-patent, ivermectin and fenbendazole bring in minimal profits, which means pharmaceutical companies are not interested in promoting them or touting their benefits.
Belzberg makes the case for ivermectin and fenbendazole to be compounded with other complementary substances to create a synergistic anti-cancer concoction that is safe and effective for widespread use.
“Despite these challenges, the repurposing of these compounds carries potential advantages that justify further exploration,” Belzberg wrote. “Since the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of these substances are well-known, their development as anticancer agents could be faster and less expensive than for new drugs.”
“Furthermore, the successful repurposing of these compounds could provide a cost-effective way to expand anticancer treatments, possibly improving patient outcomes while reducing healthcare costs.”
Another paper by Belzberg suggests that taking ivermectin with quercetin can synergistically fight prion diseases, also known as transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, or TSEs.
TSEs represent a group of fatal neurodegenerative diseases characterized by the misfolding of the prion protein, or PrP.
“The promise shown by ivermectin and quercetin in their potential anti-prion activities and their modulation of tauopathy offers an interesting avenue for further exploration,” he wrote.
More tips and tricks to beating cancer without chemotherapy or radiation can be found at PreventCancer.news.
Ivermectin May Defeat Cancer and Other Common Chronic Diseases of Aging
A press release on this FDA ruling is forthcoming.
What if UFC Freedom 250 is not merely a sporting event, but yet another symbolic ceremony in the restoration of American sovereignty?
If the Act of 1871 marked the beginning of America’s transformation from a constitutional republic into a corporate entity operating within a commercial and maritime legal framework, then reversing that process would require more than legislation and executive orders.
It would require a public restoration; a visible sequence of events marking America’s return to the principles upon which it was founded in 1776.
And that process began on June 14, 2025, Flag Day. Not just any date, but the anniversary of the adoption of the American flag in 1777, the enduring symbol of the Republic and the law of the land.
The next major step came on April 18, 2026, when President Trump publicly read from 2 Chronicles, calling the nation back to God. This represented far more than a religious message, it was a public appeal to return to the original source of authority established in 1776.
Nine days later came the visit of King Charles and Queen Camilla.
This is where things become particularly interesting. If 1776 represented America’s separation from the British Crown, then the King’s presence during a supposed restoration process carries obvious symbolic significance. Even more curious was the revival of the ancient tradition known as “telling the bees.”
For centuries, bees were informed when a monarch died, when ownership changed hands, or when authority was transferred from one custodian to another. The ritual traditionally marked the end of one era and the beginning of another. It now marked the symbolic return of authority from the Crown back to the American people.
On May 17th came the National Prayer of Dedication, exactly one lunar cycle after Trump’s call for the nation to return to God. This represented the public rededication of the nation and the reaffirmation of the original covenant.
Then came the changing of the guard at the Federal Reserve.
On May 25th, Kevin Warsh was sworn in as Chairman of the Federal Reserve, the institution that represents the central pillar of the debt based financial system that emerged from the post 1871 order.
These events are steps in a carefully sequenced process.
Which brings us to June 14, 2026, exactly one year after Flag Day, a UFC event is scheduled to take place on the South Lawn of the White House.
At first glance it appears completely unrelated to everything that came before it. But what if it is not?
What if UFC Freedom 250 serves as a public symbolic ceremony marking the people’s participation in, and acceptance of, the restoration process itself?
Major transitions require more than declarations from leaders and symbolic gestures from institutions. They require the visible participation of the people themselves.
Throughout history, public ceremonies have served as a means of expressing collective consent. Coronations, public oaths, parades, celebrations and national spectacles have all been used to mark the acceptance of a new order, a new ruler or a new chapter in a nation’s history.
The UFC Freedom 250 is more than entertainment; it’s a highly visible public spectacle taking place on sovereign American soil, on Flag Day, exactly one year after the alleged restoration process began and only weeks before the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence.
An estimated one billion people will be watching, emotionally investing themselves in the spectacle.
The foreign champions and contenders represent the established international order, while the American fighter competing on sovereign American soil represents the ‘we the people’ reclaiming their own ground.
The event functions as a visible demonstration that the American people embrace a return to the principles of 1776 and the sovereignty that was lost after 1871.
The fight itself is not the point, the point is the ceremony, the point is the people’s participation.
UFC Freedom 250 may represent yet another step in a process that began a year earlier and culminates on July 4th, 2026, exactly 250 years after America declared its independence from the British Crown and placed itself under the sovereignty of God.
The battle for independence did not end in 1776, it has taken two and a half centuries to complete.
SCOTUS begins unloading big decisions; “major wins” for Republicans; shackles stripped off; Haitians now face largest mass deportation in history; Trump’s reverse-lawfare strategy pays off; more.
Good morning, C&C, it’s Friday! Yesterday the Supreme Court began publishing its more controversial decisions, including a pair of immigration cases that badly triggered the left. We’ll look at why it triggered progressives, why CNN calls the decisions “major wins” for conservatives, and why they made the New York Times fret about ‘taking the President’s shackles off’— a very odd metaphor for them to use. Then we’ll connect all that to Trump’s anti-lawfare strategy and even to the SAVE Act’s prospects.
🌍🇺🇸 ESSENTIAL NEWS AND COMMENTARY 🇺🇸🌍
⚖️⚖️⚖️
As we rocket into the tail end of June —the Nation’s 250th Anniversary is now only eight days away— the Supreme Court is following its usual custom of clearing its back catalog of controversial decisions. Next week is the final week when the headline cases drop. But we’re starting to reach the good stuff. Yesterday, CNN reported, “Supreme Court gives Trump major wins on two immigration cases.” That was a pretty tame example.
Democrats of all stripes are losing their minds, and corporate media is unloading bizarrely hysterical headlines. But it was terrific news for Springfield’s cats and dogs.
The Justices have a habit of saving their spiciest cases for last, practically tossing them to clerks over their shoulders as they race to their cars to get out of dodge before the fireworks start. Waiting till the last second has the happy effects of: reducing the hordes of angry activists screaming into air horns, shrinking crowds infesting the Court’s front porch, and eliminating the ever-present miasma of rancid B.O. floating up from sweaty protesters into SCOTUS windows.
You can’t blame them. If SCOTUS released its sauciest cases early in the term, it would have to endure constant protests. And, ‘Ain’t nobody has time for dat.’ After all, that’s their workplace.
What I immediately noticed in yesterday’s dump of highly controversial immigration cases was that it suggests the final batch of eight orders we have yet to see will be off the chain. Before we discuss what happened yesterday, note what the Court is still holding back: birthright citizenship, transgender sports bans, agency removal power, Fed appointments, and mail‑in ballot deadlines.
Those last eight will explode into view next week, days or hours before the Court takes its summer holiday, and right before the Independence Day weekend.
Happy Fourth of July, America!
⚖️ SCOTUS dropped only four opinions yesterday. The first decision held that Hawaii may not enforce special gun restrictions just because ancestral spirits told it to (i.e., “Hawaiian native traditions”). You think I’m joking? Justice Alito wrote, “the Second Amendment has the same meaning in all parts of the United States. It cannot give way to ‘the spirit of Aloha’ in Hawaii any more than it can yield to the spirit of the Big Apple or the Windy City.”
Hawaiians. SMDH.
The next decision made the unsurprising (but disappointing) 7-2 decision that Roundup must only follow the EPA’s labeling rules to avoid liability for ‘failure to warn’ injuries, and not whatever juries think should be on the labels. A very odd couple dissented— Justice Neil Gorsuch joined Justice Jackson’s dissent.
It wasn’t a major decision. They didn’t hold that Roundup was globally immune from any injury claims— just claims related to labeling. But SCOTUS knew it was potentially explosive.
Those were the two uncontroversial decisions. The bombs came next.
⚖️ The last two were the pair of immigration cases that CNN’s headline called “major wins” for Trump. TAW! You know what thatmeans. “Major wins” trigger progressive hysteria. The Washington Post’s overwrought headline even suggested the decisions threatened public health:
(Mixed metaphor alert! Immigrants ‘brace’ for impact, not fallout. Like, the impact of being thrown in an ICE van. For fallout, they need to wear a radiation suit or something. Come on, guys. Probably a rushed headline.)
The New York Times published this alarming guest essay based on the immigration decisions, broadening them into a dystopian theme of diabolical authoritarianism once again descending on the country and causing the ‘sunset of democracy’ or whatever:
(This headline was also rushed. First, unshackling presumes the presidency isshackled to begin with, and that shackling is a good thing. But who or what shackled the presidency to begin with? The Deep State? It never says. Second, aren’t shackles something you put on slaves? How could that be a good thing?)
In the pair’s first decision, the Court explained what the word “arrived” meant. Federal law lets foreigners who’ve “arrived” in the U.S. apply for asylum. Activists prefer that “arrived” include migrants reaching any Mexican border town, where NGOs all have asylum offices.
SCOTUS said nope. Arrived means you’re in the house. Or in this case, in the country. They must literally cross the border before they are entitled to apply for asylum.
So that was bad enough; a clear win for Trump. But that first decision was just the local warm-up band. The headliner was next.
⚖️ The second immigration decision set the political world on fire. Oddly, the case doesn’t sound like it should have been an earthquake. Once again, the Court merely defined a common dictionary word, this time the word “temporary.”
If temporary means anything, they opined, applying common sense, it’s that something temporary has to end sometime.
(On an aside, this is the kind of clear-eyed analysis I wish they’d done during the pandemic about all the “temporary” states of covid emergency. Oh well. I suppose some temporary things persist longer than others, like herpes outbreaks. “There is nothing so permanent as a temporary government program.” — Reagan.)
In the decision, styled Mullin v. Doe, the Court lifted lower court injunctions blocking the Trump Administration from terminating the “temporary protected status” of 350,000 Haitians and a few thousand Syrians. They are not citizens or even applicants for citizenship, but have been here “temporarily” for ages, on the theory that the U.S. is nicer and safer than the third-world hellholes where they came from.
Activist judges had agreed with activist plaintiffs that, while ‘temporary’ doessuggest some kind of ending, Trump is a racist. And if he is a racist, then he shouldn’t be allowed to cancel people’s temporary protected status (TPS).
The Supremes said the activists were looking in the wrong spot. The law “trumps” anyone’s feelings. Then —and this was the hand grenade— it said federal courts shouldn’t meddle in the President’s immigration decisions. Regarding TPS, SCOTUS explained that immigration law both gave the DHS Secretary broad discretion to terminate temporary status and also stated that there is “no judicial review of any determination of the Secretary.”
KABOOM.
⚖️ “The administration is now free to move forward with what immigrants’ rights advocates describe as the largest de-documentation in U.S. history,” the Times piece explained. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) called it, “a cruel and inhumane decision; the Supreme Court just turned its back on more than 300,000 Haitians and thousands of Syrians.”
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), Whip Katherine Clark (D-MA), Senator Ed Markey (D-MA), and Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-MA) pitched a dramatic, grandstanding press conference on SCOTUS’s front porch (see?), calling Mullin v. Doe, without exaggeration, a “horrendous, racist policy of deportation” that was “offensive to everyone on every single level.”
Whew!
The reaction was immediate, sort of crazy, and it was everywhere. NYC’s Boy Mayor Zohran Mamdani issued a defiant statement calling SCOTUS’s decision “a cruelty that has become normalized,” pledging solidarity with “Haitian and Syrian brothers and sisters” (even using the Marxist dog whistle ‘solidarity’ three times in less than two minutes), and vowing that the decision was “something that we will not ever accept.”
Many commenters noted it sounded like Mamdani promised to defy the Supreme Court. Which was weird because Democrats can’t shut up about President Trumpsupposedly defying court orders. But never mind! That’s different.
Anyway, the big-talking Mamdani bragged about how 3 million New Yorkers (out of 8 million) are natives of other countries. He even read out a Mayor’s office emergencytoll-free hotline for any “affected immigrants,” which he repeated twice: 1-800-354-0365.
Wouldn’t it be a shame if that number were clogged with people asking so many silly questions that operators went insane?
Remember all the amusing viral mashups from the 2024 election season’s evergreen story about Haitian TPS immigrants in Illinois, crashing into school buses, harvesting geese from city parks, and eating locals’ pets. In tearful tirades at city council meetings, multiple residents reported Haitian petnapping was happening. But Springfield’s police chief and part-time slumlord (he owns two dozen migrant rental houses whose rent is paid by federal tax dollars) “debunked” the story. So.
⚖️ I’m telling you: pay attention to this. For some reason, this story about a relatively small group of affected Haitians is still huge. As we’ve now seen, corporate media, far-leftists, and rank-and-file Democrats are all squealing like slaughtered pigs. What in Hades is going on?
First of all, it’s historic in ways that might escape casual notice. SCOTUS just unraveled a longstanding, secret law that Democrats used to sneak in large numbers of illegals, but legally. Yesterday, activist Guerline Jozef, the founder of an NGO called the Haitian Bridge Alliance, explained the big picture. Listen to the whole thing; it’s important (and it’s less than 60 seconds).
Temporary has always been interpreted more like indefinitely. “We have TPS holders who have been in this country, calling the U.S. home for the past 10, 15, 20 years,” Guerline said. Twenty years! Who even needs citizenship, when TPS is available?
“They are our doctors, caregivers, attorneys, taxi drivers,” she continued.
Wait, what? Doctors and attorneys? Those jobs require licenses. To get a license to practice law, applicants must graduate from a credentialed law school (a three-year, full-time program) and then pass a state bar exam. Medical licenses are even more demanding.
So… how are ‘temporary’ refugee residents —noncitizens— getting professional licenses that take years of effort for citizens to obtain?
In other words, this clever progressive wordplay has been concealing illegals for a long time. TPS was the secret sauce for how Biden quickly brought people into the country in large numbers and long-term, despite any pesky ‘problems’ precluding real citizenship applications (like criminal histories).
But yesterday’s decision was the first real reduction in the TPS laws in, well, forever. Which brings us to the second dangerous point for Democrats. If it’s okay for the Administration to end TPS status for Haitians and Syrians because courts must refrain from meddling, then it is also okay to end TPS for residents of 17 other countries, which is over a million more noncitizens who are absolutely not voting in elections, perish the thought.
⚖️ As I explained, the Court has essentially held that federal courts have no businessreviewing the administration’s decision to terminate TPS. That is a structural precedent: it swells presidential discretion (“unshackling”) over a major immigration program and shrinks judicial checks.
Most importantly: this SCOTUS decision affects all future administrations and countries (not just Haiti and Syria).
Don’t miss the staggering implication: President Trump is finding ‘Plan B’ strategies to make his executive orders permanent, without needing new laws from Congress. He’s driving the migrant bus around the uncooperative legislative branch to the courthouse.
Since Republicans in the Senate won’t help, Trump is getting help from a surprising source: Democrat lawfare. Whenever the Supreme Court decides a case, it makes binding law. Thus, future presidents can’t just reverse Trump’s executive orders, since the legal precedent has confirmed them.
Trump’s team realized there are two sources for law: the Legislative branch andthe Judicial branch. He’s not bothering much with the messy, delayed, and often unsatisfying business of lawmaking in the House and Senate sausage factories.
That’s why the Democrats and their socialist allies are so upset. They shouldhave kept out of all the lawfare, but they just can’t help themselves. It’s like an OCD. But they are starting to catch on now, waking up to how Trump is using their reflexive litigation against them.
For example, yesterday, Gavin “Slick Willy 2.0” Newsom —discussing his 2028 run on his own podcast— said the Court needs to be expanded to 13 Justices. “We gotta win; we gotta consolidate power,” he explained. He talked about Court packing more than he did about Democrats needing to win back the House or Senate.
⚖️ Finally, let’s tie some threads together. How about something really cool to think about? President Trump has often said he’d pass the SAVE Act by executive order if Congress doesn’t. Nobody knew what he meant. But here’s the thing— federal law already prohibits non-citizens from voting in federal elections. That law is already on the books.
The problem is, apart from a handful of red states, nobody bothers to enforce that federal law. Well, guess what?
Last year, President Trump issued an executive order to proactively enforce existing election law by requiring states to verify legal ID for voting. Then, of course, Democrats sued in several blue jurisdictions. The cases are working their way through several courts right now. Many cases mean many shots on the SCOTUS goal.
The decision teed that particular case up for appeal, which puts it on track for SCOTUS review.
Among other proposed changes, President Trump’s order would require people to provide documentary proof of citizenship when registering to vote, prevent mail ballots from being counted if they arrive after Election Day, even if they were postmarked by then, and punish non-compliant states by withholding federal money.
Next, imagine that the Supreme Court upholds parts or all of Trump’s executive order as constitutional. That would take even more shackles off the President and allow him to enforce existing laws, which is literally the Executive Branch’s primary purpose.
One of the ways Trump upholds his “Trump always wins” brand is through maintaining multiple paths to victory. This week’s SCOTUS decisions already set the progressive world afire. I can’t wait to find out what next week will deliver.
Have a fantastic Friday! Tune back in tomorrow morning, for the Weekend Edition’s roundup of essential news and caffeinated commentary.
Share this: Send the word out using these buttons!
