Editor’s Note: Okey-dokey, folks…here we go! Please be aware of just how Federal Law is in the process of BEing used to take down the Deep State. Because the “laws of the land” are being used in exquisite detail by Pres. Trump to take down the evil dark (Democrats), positive change will be seen soon. Please see here for information regarding the Gates Foundation.

Editor’s Note: Okey-dokey, folks…here we go! Please be aware of just how Federal Law is in the process of BEing used to take down the Deep State. Because the “laws of the land” are being used in exquisite detail by Pres. Trump to take down the evil dark (Democrats), positive change will be seen soon. Please see here for information regarding the Gates Foundation.

I have listed all other pertinent information below, which shows how legal detail designed and implemented by the dark, is now being used to defeat the dark. Pay attention to the lyrics used by SuperTramp in their iconic album, “Crimes of the Century”. Who knew (?) of their applicability of these lyrics NOW, pay attention to the fact of how human abuse is being tied to the process of interwoven corruption on our world, see the legal system for the Republic of the United States is being used to save the world, and then BE in…

Quantum Joy!

___________________________________________________________________________________________

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

“The RICO laws would apply if you could show a common purpose to commit crimes, and it has to be certain crimes, and the crimes have to fit into a federal category,” Giuliani said. “Now if you followed the money, and you found fraud and things like that, you’d be real close to being able to have a RICO case.” ~ Rudy Giuliani

109. RICO Charges

In case you’re wondering, as I write this the sun will be up over the mountain in about 35 minutes. The sky is clear blue—no sign of a solar storm. Comms are fine.

With this talk of a solar storm I’m wondering if they’re going to show NASA to be the lying, treasonous, rogue agency it is. It’s no longer a government body—it’s private, from what I’ve heard. They protected the Secret Space Program while siphoning trillions of taxpayer dollars annually to fund it.

They have what most of us would consider miraculous (health) technology and they keep it for themselves while we suffer, all the while pretending there are no space craft or ETs and ridiculing anyone who mentions it. Off with their heads!

Russian military guarding a crashed saucer

Have you seen this video below? MUST LISTEN. Big Pharma is going down, and so are a lot of medical practitioners. No more death by medication. Warranties required. Liability. It’s about time.

Of course we all need to take responsibility for our own health. We cannot put doctors on pedestals and blindly follow their advice. The control freaks who have been running the planet spent a great deal of money “indoctrinating” those in medical schools and taking medical training, whether physical or mental.

If they had questioned rather than accepting the programming, they would have realized the dangers inherent in medical practices, but they did not. Many accepted bribes to willingly become drug pushers and mislead Humanity who trusted them.

The speaker, a planetary judge, then goes on to address elections and voting rights and procedures and the impossibilities we’ve just seen here in America. The citizens’ votes were stolen; the contract with the state broken. Outright fraud. Organized crime and mob rule.

He explains that the FEMA camps (with guillotines?) are filling up due to the fraud rampant in America and globally. Those who committed the crimes are LIABLE. Period. It’s all a matter of contracts that we are ignorant of. No longer.

“Anybody who disables you has broken Universal Law.” No more fraudulent maritime law, admiralty law, law of the sea: We acknowledge only Universal Law, natural law, common law, Law of the Land.

Now, this is Part 3 of 3. I’d love to hear the rest. He makes it clear the voter fraud is GLOBAL, and that We, the People, are not even considered “citizens”. We have zero rights in their system, and he explains the mechanisms for elections and how we can protect our rights.

He explains why judges always wear black robes. It is in honour of the dead. WE are all dead to them. Isn’t that right, RDS? And what of the ITNJ tribunal where he wears the black robe?

This is phenomenal stuff folks. A real education. It doesn’t mean the battle is over. It arms us to do battle.

You can learn more here at his channel. 26 minutes.

[” Breaking News – Global Arrests are Imminent. “] 3 of 3.

The Earth Alliance continues to expose the dark cabal’s established trickery in elections. One of Donald Trump’s campaign promises stated his administration would shift the power back to The People, where it belongs. If you can’t elect the individual the majority chooses to run the country as well as who represents you locally then you have no power, n’est-ce pas? Canada knows; as do many other nations. Democracy? That is an illusion. That’s the mockingbird media trying to drill it into our heads that it exists. It’s a Republic—“if  you can keep it”.

COURT-ORDERED AUDIT: DOMINION VOTING MACHINES WERE DESIGNED FOR FRAUD

We also find it interesting to see that in addition to Joe Biden coming apart at the seams mentally, and Nancy Pelosi has been a mere caricature for some time, now they claim Dianne Feinstein is suffering from cognitive decline. No problem. I hear the new expansion and upgrades at Guantanamo Bay are designed for decrepit, aged psychopaths so they can serve their sentences with dignity. Totally accessible. If they didn’t commit high treason (and I believe they did) the military tribunals will ensure they get exactly what they deserve. Unlike the psychopaths who have been running the world, we deliver Humanely and LAWFULLY.

The fact is, there are a helluva lot of guillotines collecting dust and I hate to see taxpayer dollars go to waste. Do we get to at least try them out? Some suggest that public hangings or the lobbing off of heads might be a powerful deterrent to wayward people who wish to continue their treasonous ways.

LOOK! All I did was type that and this notification popped up. It worked!

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz to loosen COVID restrictions on bars, gyms and youth sports

Simon Parkes has a 7 minute update I haven’t seen with valuable clarification. Many are confused by the current process underway due to the disinformation pumped out by the media and the demonrat party. There’s a huge difference between reality and what the lying, treasonous media claim. The White Hats know what they’re doing, folks.

14th December Update Current News Follow-up

BCP has it all figured out and shares his expert commentary.

WE WILL BE VICTORIOUS! HUGE $46 MILLION CLUE! RINOS LOVE THE LARP. JOE/CHINA/HUNTER/PELOSI/RAND PAUL

And We Know… Trump will be inaugurated for his second term. We just know. Wait and see.

12.16.20: AMAZING courage DISPLAYED throughout the NATION! Coming in for LANDING!

And here’s Dave’s take on it from yesterday’s X22 Report. See the video or listen to the audio at the link.

The Case Is Being Built, Crime Of The Century, The Eagle Has Landed – Ep. 2354

https://x22report.com/the-case-is-being-built-crime-of-the-century-the-eagle-has-landed-ep-2354/embed/#?secret=u0mMM5S4rq

The foreign interference from China is so much bigger than we thought. Congress is going down. The system is broken and deeply compromised. Betrayal like we never imagined.

Mitch McConnell is married to Elaine Chao.
Elaine Chao’s sister is Angela Chao.
Angela Chao is married to billionaire venture capitalist Jim Breyer.

Jim Breyer is very close with the CCP chairman Xi Jinping. pic.twitter.com/HRvlmUEKGc

— Ron (@CodeMonkeyZ) December 16, 2020

14 Attempts to Undermine Trump Revealed | Declassified | Gina Shakespeare

Q told us we had more than we know. Indeed.

Foreshadowing? https://t.co/Q8exAHwCtn pic.twitter.com/xz6bgVbHa5

— re5iGaM (@re5iGam) December 16, 2020

Asymptomatic Covid-19 spread isn’t real, so why are people still wearing a mask?

If the above link doesn’t work, use this one.

Here’s the latest on Julian Assange from Project Veritas just released today.

Veritas Obtains Recording Of Call Between Wikileaks Julian Assange & Lawyer In Clinton’s State Dept

I have to get back to packing. My other half is putting me to shame with the volume of work he is accomplishing and I still have walkies to do. One day I forgot to take Mica out but he was bounding down the trail with enthusiasm yesterday so I redeemed myself. Forgiven.

Please don’t take the outrageous claims the mainstream media make seriously—even some alt media. It’s all under control, folks. Dream sweet dreams of your glorious future and stay informed. Facts matter. BE the change. NO FEAR.

Thank you for your support of all kinds. It’s much appreciated.  ~ BP

It is unlawful for anyone employed by or associated with any enterprise engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce, to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt. 18 U.S.C.A. § 1962(c) (West 1984). The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO) was passed by Congress with the declared purpose of seeking to eradicate organized crime in the United States. Russello v. United States, 464 U.S. 16, 26-27, 104 S. Ct. 296, 302-303, 78 L. Ed. 2d 17 (1983); United States v. Turkette, 452 U.S. 576, 589, 101 S. Ct. 2524, 2532, 69 L. Ed. 2d 246 (1981). A violation of Section 1962(c), requires (1) conduct (2) of an enterprise (3) through a pattern (4) of racketeering activity. Sedima, S.P.R.L. v. Imrex Co., 473 U.S. 479, 496, 105 S. Ct. 3275, 3285, 87 L. Ed. 2d 346 (1985).

A more expansive view holds that in order to be found guilty of violating the RICO statute, the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt: (1) that an enterprise existed; (2) that the enterprise affected interstate commerce; (3) that the defendant was associated with or employed by the enterprise; (4) that the defendant engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity; and (5) that the defendant conducted or participated in the conduct of the enterprise through that pattern of racketeering activity through the commission of at least two acts of racketeering activity as set forth in the indictment. United States v. Phillips, 664 F. 2d 971, 1011 (5th Cir. Unit B Dec. 1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1136, 102 S. Ct. 1265, 73 L. Ed. 2d 1354 (1982).

An “enterprise” is defined as including any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity, and any union or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity. 18 U.S.C.A. §  1961(4) (West 1984). Many courts have noted that Congress mandated a liberal construction of the RICO statute in order to effectuate its remedial purposes by holding that the term “enterprise” has an expansive statutory definition. United States v. Delano, 825 F. Supp. 534, 538-39 (W.D.N.Y. 1993), aff’d in part, rev’d in part, 55 F. 3d 720 (2d Cir. 1995), cases cited therein.

“Pattern of racketeering activity” requires at least two acts of racketeering activity committed within ten years of each other. 18 U.S.C.A. § 1961(5) (West 1984). Congress intended a fairly flexible concept of a pattern in mind. H.J., Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Tel. Co., 492 U.S. 229, 239, 109 S. Ct. 2893, 2900, 106 L. Ed. 2d 195 (1989). The government must show that the racketeering predicates are related, and that they amount to or pose a threat of continued criminal activity. Id. Racketeering predicates are related if they have the same or similar purposes, results, participants, victims, or methods of commission, or otherwise are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated events. Id. at 240, 109 S. Ct. at 2901; Ticor Title Ins. Co. v. Florida, 937 F. 2d 447, 450 (9th Cir. 1991). Furthermore, the degree in which these factors establish a pattern may depend on the degree of proximity, or any similarities in goals or methodology, or the number of repetitions. United States v. Indelicato, 865 F. 2d 1370, 1382 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 811, 110 S. Ct. 56, 107 L. Ed. 2d 24 (1989).

Continuity refers either to a closed period of repeated conduct, or to past conduct that by its nature projects into the future with a threat of repetition. H.J., Inc., 492 U.S. at 241-42, 109 S. Ct. at 2902. A party alleging a RICO violation may demonstrate continuity over a closed period by proving a series of related predicates extending over a substantial period of time. Id. Predicate acts extending over a few weeks or months and threatening no future criminal conduct do not satisfy this requirement as Congress was concerned with RICO in long-term criminal conduct. Id.

As to the continuity requirement, the government may show that the racketeering acts found to have been committed pose a threat of continued racketeering activity by proving: (1) that the acts are part of a long-term association that exists for criminal purposes, or (2) that they are a regular way of conducting the defendant’s ongoing legitimate business, or (3) that they are a regular way of conducting or participating in an ongoing and legitimate enterprise. Id.

When a RICO action is brought before continuity can be established, then liability depends on whether the threat of continuity is demonstrated. Id. However, Judge Scalia wrote in his concurring opinion that it would be absurd to say that “at least a few months of racketeering activity. . .is generally for free, as far as RICO is concerned.” Id. at 254, 109 S. Ct. at 2908. Therefore, if the predicate acts involve a distinct threat of long-term racketeering activity, either implicit or explicit, a RICO pattern is established. Id. at 242, 109 S. Ct. at 2902.

The RICO statute expressly states that it is unlawful for any person to conspire to violate any of the subsections of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1962. The government need not prove that the defendant agreed with every other conspirator, knew all of the other conspirators, or had full knowledge of all the details of the conspiracy. Delano, 825 F. Supp. at 542. All that must be shown is: (1) that the defendant agreed to commit the substantive racketeering offense through agreeing to participate in two racketeering acts; (2) that he knew the general status of the conspiracy; and (3) that he knew the conspiracy extended beyond his individual role. United States v. Rastelli, 870 F. 2d 822, 828 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 982, 110 S. Ct. 515, 107 L. Ed. 2d 516 (1989).

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Ebook and paperback book by Investigative Journalist George Webb

Awan Minutes to Midnight: Finding Hilary’s Blackberries and Everything After

available on Amazon – Kindle $1.99

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Executive Orders

Executive Order Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption

Law & Justice

Issued on: December 21, 2017

---

---

Share:

All News

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act (Public Law 114-328) (the “Act”), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)) (INA), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,

I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, find that the prevalence and severity of human rights abuse and corruption that have their source, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States, such as those committed or directed by persons listed in the Annex to this order, have reached such scope and gravity that they threaten the stability of international political and economic systems. Human rights abuse and corruption undermine the values that form an essential foundation of stable, secure, and functioning societies; have devastating impacts on individuals; weaken democratic institutions; degrade the rule of law; perpetuate violent conflicts; facilitate the activities of dangerous persons; and undermine economic markets. The United States seeks to impose tangible and significant consequences on those who commit serious human rights abuse or engage in corruption, as well as to protect the financial system of the United States from abuse by these same persons.

I therefore determine that serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States, and I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat.

I hereby determine and order:

Section 1. (a) All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in:

(i) the persons listed in the Annex to this order;

(ii) any foreign person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General:

(A) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have directly or indirectly engaged in, serious human rights abuse;

(B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in:

(1) corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources, or bribery; or

(2) the transfer or the facilitation of the transfer of the proceeds of corruption;

(C) to be or have been a leader or official of:

(1) an entity, including any government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section relating to the leader’s or official’s tenure; or

(2) an entity whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order as a result of activities related to the leader’s or official’s tenure; or

(D) to have attempted to engage in any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section; and

(iii) any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General:

(A) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of:

(1) any activity described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section that is conducted by a foreign person;

(2) any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or

(3) any entity, including any government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section, where the activity is conducted by a foreign person;

(B) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or

(C) to have attempted to engage in any of the activities described in subsections (iii)(A) or (B) of this section.

(b) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted before the effective date of this order.

Sec. 2. The unrestricted immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens determined to meet one or more of the criteria in section 1 of this order would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and the entry of such persons into the United States, as immigrants or nonimmigrants, is hereby suspended. Such persons shall be treated as persons covered by section 1 of Proclamation 8693 of July 24, 2011 (Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic Powers Act Sanctions).

Sec. 3. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the types of articles specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in this order, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 1 of this order.

Sec. 4. The prohibitions in section 1 include:

(a) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; and

(b) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

Sec. 5. (a) Any transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

(b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

Sec. 6. For the purposes of this order:

(a) the term “person” means an individual or entity;

(b) the term “entity” means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization; and

(c) the term “United States person” means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.

Sec. 7. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render those measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to this order.

Sec. 8. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including adopting rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to me by IEEPA and the Act as may be necessary to implement this order and section 1263(a) of the Act with respect to the determinations provided for therein. The Secretary of the Treasury may, consistent with applicable law, redelegate any of these functions to other officers and agencies of the United States. All agencies shall take all appropriate measures within their authority to implement this order.

Sec. 9. The Secretary of State is hereby authorized to take such actions, including adopting rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to me by IEEPA, the INA, and the Act as may be necessary to carry out section 2 of this order and, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, the reporting requirement in section 1264(a) of the Act with respect to the reports provided for in section 1264(b)(2) of that Act. The Secretary of State may, consistent with applicable law, redelegate any of these functions to other officers and agencies of the United States consistent with applicable law.

Sec. 10. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General, is hereby authorized to determine that circumstances no longer warrant the blocking of the property and interests in property of a person listed in the Annex to this order, and to take necessary action to give effect to that determination.

Sec. 11. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to submit recurring and final reports to the Congress on the national emergency declared in this order, consistent with section 401(c) of the NEA (50 U.S.C. 1641(c)) and section 204(c) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1703(c)).

Sec. 12. This order is effective at 12:01 a.m., Eastern Standard Time, December 21, 2017.

Sec. 13. This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

DONALD J. TRUMP

THE WHITE HOUSE,
December 20, 2017.

ANNEX

1. Mukhtar Hamid Shah; Date of Birth (DOB) August 11, 1939; alt. DOB November 8, 1939; nationality, Pakistan

2. Angel Rondon Rijo; DOB July 16, 1950; nationality, Dominican Republic

3. Dan Gertler; DOB December 23, 1973; nationality, Israel; alt. nationality, Democratic Republic of the Congo

4. Maung Maung Soe; DOB March 1964; nationality, Burma

5. Yahya Jammeh; DOB May 25, 1965; nationality, The Gambia

6. Sergey Kusiuk; DOB December 1, 1966; nationality, Ukraine; alt. nationality, Russia

7. Benjamin Bol Mel; DOB January 3, 1978; alt. DOB December 24, 1978; nationality, South Sudan; alt. nationality, Sudan

8. Julio Antonio Juárez Ramírez; DOB December 1, 1980; nationality, Guatemala

9. Goulnora Islamovna Karimova; DOB July 8, 1972; nationality, Uzbekistan

10. Slobodan Tesic; DOB December 21, 1958; nationality, Serbia

11. Artem Yuryevich Chayka; DOB September 25, 1975; nationality, Russia

12. Gao Yan; DOB April 1963; nationality, China

13. Roberto Jose Rivas Reyes; DOB July 6, 1954; nationality, Nicaragua